So Cal Real Estate News

The old country veteran looked me in the eye.  “It’s like wrestlin’ a bear, Dave!”

“You either give it your all, and keep wrestlin’ him ’til you finally got him down on the ground & whopped,” he continued,

“Or you just give up and die!”

With those words, spoken to me just a few hours ago in the living room of our model unit deep in the green hills of McMinnville, Tennessee, we resume our adventures in out of state investing (see “What I learned about investing out of state” for the first installment).

Hmmm, I thought to myself.  He sure didn’t use that analogy two and a half years ago when he sold me those two apartment complexes.

About two weeks ago I sent “Brother James” and his associate an e-mail exploring the possibility of disposing of the two rural Tennessee complexes Barb and I acquired two long years ago.  Tired of investing too much time and money trying to turn them around, I’ve begun exploring the option of unloading them sooner rather than later.

This afternoon, after pondering the numbers I sent him and then inspecting both properties, the investment Realtor and his partner were supposed to give me their conclusions about what sort of selling price I could expect.

Instead, it seemed to be turning into a lecture on fighting on in the gallant, life-and-death struggle to turn these properties around.

As a veteran agent myself, it’s always both interesting and educational to have the tables turned and be acting as the seller or buyer.

I’m still in the process of gathering data and evaluating how badly I really want to fight on or if I’m just ready to die, which may be better than the alternative in this case.   We have made a lot of progress, but we’ve still got a lot of “challenges” ahead (in real estate, we never have “problems,” only “challenges”).

At this point, if I had it to do over again, I wouldn’t.  But I think we’ve all had trials that helped us grow, and looking back later, we appreciate the process.  It’s had some fun moments, but they’d be a lot more fun if the cash was flowing in the opposite direction.

So I still say, keep your investments close to home.

And if you do venture far, resist the temptation to leverage yourself beyond what you’re already successful at.  In my case, I bought a complex in rural Tennessee that had three times as many units as our largest California complex, even though it cost less than half what that California complex was worth.  I should have started out with a smaller complex, and I should have at least stayed in a more urban setting at first, such as greater Nashville.

Buying several houses in Franklin might have been a smarter 1031 exchange, in hindsight, as my bar-wrasslin’ realtor suggested.

Or maybe just being content with what I had.  The pursuit of expansion for expansion’s sake does add a layer of complexity which may not be worth it.

I may add more thoughts to this post later.  But right now, I’ve got to go wrestle a bear.

A week ago I told L.A. Times real estate reporter Peter Hong that much of a Realtor’s job in this market involves delivering bad news to homeowners. Pretty much the opposite of three years ago.

“You go from being like a doctor who delivers babies,” in a booming real estate market, I said, “to being an oncologist, just giving people bad news all day long.” (”Foreclosure glut further depresses housing prices“) Shoot the messenger time. Or keep dialing until the seller finds an agent who tells her what she wants to hear. (See #1 in “5 ways NOT to pick an agent.”)

Well, today brought more bad news for homeowners.

But that’s just one side of the coin. Unlike our 1980-82 housing bust, where mortgage rates topping at 16% were bad news for BOTH sellers and buyers, today’s bad news for sellers is good news for buyers.

Which can turn it into good news for some sellers who might also be buyers, and several other types of buyers:

First, this could be an excellent time to buy for “move out” sellers who are headed to more overbuilt areas like the Inland Empire, Vegas, Texas, or the Central Valley. That’s because prices there have generally dropped more than prices in Southern California’s coastal plain.

Such a “move out” seller can get her current home in escrow, then take her time looking in that outlying area, as prices continue to decline. There are plenty of homes to choose from, and lots of motivated sellers out there.

Folks who are willing to sacrifice a little temporary inconvenience for a lot of greenbacks & that elusive “perfect” home should consider renting in their new community while they continue to look. A buyer with cash in hand is in the best negotiating position, too. This move also lets you take advantage of the annual real estate market cycle (See “Market Predictions 101: Our 2 real estate market cycles“.

Second, the time may also be right for “Move Down” sellers, especially those looking to buy a condo. Since we’ve had a glut of condo building through much of our area, even coastal plain condos are experiencing rapidly declining values and lots of foreclosures.

The same goes for the more modest “starter” single family homes, which turn over more often and have more subprime loans and foreclosures. These aren’t just “blue collar” communities like Stanton or North Long Beach, but also communities like Lakewood, Cypress or even parts of Mission Viejo, which include large tracts originally build for first time buyers.

Third, this might be the right time to buy for people who are ready to settle into their dream home now. Specifically:

1. Buyers who will be living in this home for many years, and
2. Who have good credit, a down payment, and
3. Are tired of renting and are ready for the joys and trials of home ownership, and
4. Would like to start the 15 - 30 year process of paying off a mortgage so they can retire, and
5. Could use two of the three last great tax write-offs (mortgage interest, property tax, and donations), and
6. Are able to locate and negotiate an acceptable price on their “dream home.”

These buyers also might want to nail down the kids new school for next year. Maybe they’ve figured out that they want to enjoy their “dream home” while their kids are still at home. Maybe they’re concerned about interest rates going up. Maybe they know they’ve got busier times ahead & now’s the best time to look for a home & fix it up the way they want.

Maybe they know what we’ve been saying since last November: Nobody knows for sure what’s ahead. (See “How low will prices go?“)

Forth, this may well be an excellent time to buy for those whose personal situation suggests it. Someone who’s relocating into California, whether for work, family, or retirement. Someone who desperately needs a tax break. There are lots of different scenarios where personal situation trumps market speculation.

Some people would prefer to gamble with their stocks or in Vegas but not with home ownership. We believe there are plenty of things far more important than money (See “What to do when nobody knows what’s next,” “A little perspective,” and “A little more perspective.”)

Fifth, this might be a great time for buyers who appreciate the security of buying before or near the bottom.

Prices are already down 20% or more in many Southern California neighborhoods, interest rates are low, especially with inflation looming, and some special jumbo loan programs will be expiring soon. Why not take advantage of it?

Truth is, the best time to negotiate is just before the bottom. While prices don’t shoot up dramatically, the ultra motivated sellers and the super buys do disappear fairly quickly. And you never know it’s a bottom for sure until a year or two passes.

To take a very recent example, in January of 2007 we experienced a temporary “false bottom” caused by dropping rates and seasonal demand. In December I could find 10 - 12 low priced “super bargains” in Rossmoor, a popular west Orange County neighborhood. Within a month, they were all gone! We saw the same thing late in 2001 after the Fed dropped rates in the wake of 9/11.

Both 9/11/01 and 1/07 illustrate two things:

1. Super bargains disappear quickly when the market heads up.
2. You can only be sure of a bottom when you’re looking back months or even years later.

The “double dip” recession that started here in So Cal in 1989 during Gulf War I, then reversed to a new peak in 1990, then collapsed into the end-of-the-Cold-War bust of 1991 - 95 is a great example of # 2.

A personal story. During the ‘91 - ‘95 bust, Barb and I did not enjoy watching our rental homes decline in value, even as my income from real estate sales was also tumbling. But I wanted to avoid hefty taxes from selling those homes, many of which we’d owed for along time.

One day my colleague, John Spear, mentioned in passing that multi family properties in Long Beach had dropped to prices as low as four times Gross Rent. That means the price was down to 4 x the annual rent for some apartments.

Well, since apartments generally produce more income than single family homes, I decided it was time to use the wonderful tool of the 1031 Starker Delayed Exchange to convert our rental homes into rental apartment buildings. That way, even if the market continued to drop, at least we’d have some positive cash flow.

At that point, it looked like prices would continue to drop for years to come. A popular New York financial analyst wrote a syndicated column about how Southern California would never recover. Ever.

As they say, it’s always darkest just before the dawn. Turns out, I was buying at the bottom, but I didn’t know it. Possibly the best financial move (other than structured donations) that Barb & I ever made. And we didn’t even know it at the time. We were just lucky. Blessed, actually.

Bottom line?

If you can find a home you love and can afford with a 30-year or 15-year fixed mortgage, in a location you love, maybe it’s time to stop betting on further drops and become a homeowner. Even a professional gambler knows when to cash in his chips.

At least some of them. You could always pick up a rental or vacation home later on if prices continue to drop.

At least it might be time to start looking. Even if we all think the bottom’s still a ways off.

Only God knows for sure.

And He agrees with us that there are things far more important than money (see Matthew 6:19 - 34).

May 21 update: Ongoing increases in foreclosures and long term interest rates now make us more inclined to think that the bottom may be further off than we had hoped.

That doesn’t significantly alter our basic conclusions in this post, but it should at a little more caution. And a little more hope for those who are still saving for a down and seeking to improve their credit.

We recommend you check out today’s post on the subject: “Oh-oh! We just passed a nationwide bottom!.”

For the next few days, we’re in the process of making several changes to this and two other blog sites.

As long as you’re aware of what’s going on, it’s all good.

First, we’re launching the first of several blogs we plan which will be devoted to one specific community or region.  We’re starting off with Lakewood, where I (David Emerson) grew up and where Blair now lives.  Other regional sites we’ve got in the planning stages include Long Beach and several regions of Orange County.

For a few more days, however,  LakewoodRealEstateNews.com will be forwarding automatically to SoCalRealEstateNews.com, because almost all of our posts here are quite relevent for Lakewood buyers and sellers.  If you were looking for LakewoodRealEstateNews.com, we suggest you click on some of our “Top Posts in the sidebar to your right, then come back in a few days when the Lakewood site will be fully functional.

Second, we’re in the middle of switching our domain from wordpress to our own host. So right now, you’ll find “SoCalRealEstateNews” in two places, SoCalRealEstateNews.com (that’s where you are now, with a closeup of green leaves at the top, for now) and SoCalRealEstateNews.wordpress.com (which has a photo of Blair and Beth at Crystal Cove across the top.)

For now, when you click on “internal” links, you’ll sometimes find yourself switched to the other site, but the posts themselves are the same.

Having our own hosting gives us greater flexibility, so eventually we will phase out the wordpress site.

If this is all confusing to you, don’t worry about it.  Just scroll or click through either site, enjoy, & give us your suggestions and feedback by leaving your comments by clicking “comments” at the end of each post.

Thank you for your patience, and for visiting SoCalRealEstate News.com.

To find out more about who we are and what we do, just click here.

Just as the National Association of Realtors’ forecasts tend to be overly optimistic (see this morning’s post), Chapman University’s tend to be quite pessimistic. I think they’re still mad that Gary Watts made them look foolish several years in a row, or it could just be something inherent in their system.

Anyway, as part of their coming June “comprehensive forecast of key economic variables,” Chapman’s Economic Research Center today released their projection of Los Angeles County, Orange County, and Inland Empire housing prices based only on one variable, affordability.

To reach the historical average affordability rate, Chapman says L.A.County median home prices need to fall an additional 23.3% and Orange County by another 13.7%. The Inland Empire, which has had the more severe overbuilding and foreclosure rates, need “only” fall another 8.2% to reach Chapman’s magical median.

Now for the bad news:

“It is likely that home prices will decline even more . . . since corrections usually drop the affordability index below the historical mean.”

Their math assumes modest income increases and flat interest rates. Declining rates could significantly decrease the amount of “correction” needed, while more modest pay increases could offset at least some of that.

I think historical trends in L.A. and Orange Counties are skewed by many years of affordable land. Today’s situation of being practically built out on the coastal plain should result in higher affordability rates, in our opinion. That doesn’t totally invalidate Chapman’s conclusions–we’d just pick more modest numbers. We’re also hopeful that continue declines in mortgage rates will increase affordability.

It seems to us that both Chapman University and Gary Watts are like broken clocks. Gary’s stuck at sunrise: He always thinks prices will keep going up. Chapman’s stuck at midnight: The worst is yet to come. They’re both right once in each economic cycle, like a broken 24-hour clock that’s right once a day.

Still it’s one more thing to consider. We think a 5% - 10% additional price drop will hopefully do it for the coastal plain at least. (See “A Change in Our Projections“).

Like we keep saying, nobody knows for sure (See “How Low Will Prices Go?”).

For Chapman’s full report, including some nifty charts, in PDF form, click here.

And click here for “a little perspective” on our real estate woes, here for “a little more perspective,” here to find out “what to do when nobody knows what’s next,” or here to find out “how to sell your So Cal home for top dollar in 30 days.”

As for me, I think it’s time to get outside in this beautiful weather & go for a jog.

We got our April “Research Update” from NAR yesterday (”Existing Home Sales to Stabilize Before Upturn in Second Half of 2008“) . That seems too optimistic to us.

Maybe Lawrence Yun, their new Chief Economist, hasn’t heard about the annual cycle yet (See “Market Predictions 101:  Our 2 Real Estate Cycles“), because he thinks things will start picking up when they start slowing down in most years.

Here are the first three paragraphs of NAR’s press release:

Little change is expected in existing-home sales over the next few months, before improving notably during the second half of the year, according to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors®.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the market will come into clearer focus this summer.  “Existing home sales could start to show a sustained increase within a few months, unless there are some additional economic problems or excessive inflationary pressure,” he said.  “We’re looking for essentially stable sales in the near term, before higher mortgage loan limits translate into more sales in high-cost markets.  The wider access to affordable credit should increase sales activity notably this summer as pent-up demand begins to be met.”

The Pending Home Sales Index,* a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in February, slipped 1.9 percent to 84.6 from an upwardly revised reading of 86.2 in January, and was 21.4 percent lower than the February 2007 index of 107.6.  “The slip in pending home sales implies we’re not out of the woods yet, though an era of successive deep sales declines appears to be over,” Yun said.

We do see some signs of bottoming, but from where our office sits on the OC/LA County line off the 605 in Lakewood, we really can’t tell if it’s just a spring uptick on a longer downward trail.  We’re still sticking with our most recent forecast (see “A Change in Our Projections?“)

We think DataQuick’s numbers from yesterday only tend to confirm our perspective (”What DQs numbers mean“)

Update from David Emerson: We wrote the following post early 4/15, in anticipation of DataQuick’s release of their March closing statistics for all of Southern California, including L.A. & Orange Counties, Lakewood, Long Beach, Los Alamitos, and the surrounding area. As we predicted, DQ’s March numbers showed an increase in sales which was quite modest by seasonal standards, and also a modest firming in prices.

We’ll insert excerpts from today’s DQ report at appropriate points through the post below. We’ll indent them & put them in italics. We’re leaving our earlier projections and commentary unchanged, because it’s still applicable:

“DataSlow,” as we like to call them, should be out today with their March closing statistics for Southern California. Here’s our preview & interpretation. We’ll update this as needed once the numbers are out.

Data quick reports Southern California two statistics every week and every month: sales volume and median sales price.

It looks like both will be down from March 2007, which will probably get most of the attention. But the month over month figures should be more hopeful.

We expect sales volume to be up a tad from February,

[Here's what DQ reported:] A total of 12,808 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties in March. That was up 18.8 percent from 10,777 the previous month but down 41.4 percent from 21,856 in March 2007.

and median prices to be pretty close to February’s numbers.

The median price paid for a Southland home was $385,000 last month, the lowest since $380,000 in April 2004. Last month’s median was down 5.6 percent from February’s $408,000, and down a record 23.8 percent from $505,000 in February 2007. That peak median of $505,000 was reached several times last spring and summer.

[Dave here. This is still a reduction in the rate of decline, and it was caused by some of the problems with median statistics, details below. When isolated by county, the stabilization is more apparent. For example, Orange County's March median of $506,000 was down less than 3% from February's OC DQ median of $520,000. More significantly, OC's $506k March median was actually up from DQs last 4 week OC reports, which both came in at $500,000. Pretty much what we predicted--but don't read too much into that, bulls (details to follow)

Now a word about what that would mean.

It's important to bear in mind what these numbers actually are. First, in terms of today's rapidly moving market, DQs numbers are ancient history. That's because Data Quick today will report Southern California real estate sales that closed escrow during March.

That means the purchase offer was most likely written 45-60 days earlier: Someplace between January 1 and February 14.

Second, DQ's price numbers are medians. If more homes are selling in stater neighborhoods, the median price will drop even if prices are rising. (For a more detailed discussion of the problems with DataQuick's numbers, see "Two big problems with DataQuick's median prices.")

The sharp and sudden drop of the Southland median price reflects a combination of factors, mainly depreciation, especially in areas hammered by foreclosures, and a big shift in the types of homes selling. Since last August, when the continuing credit crunch hit, sales have plunged for more expensive homes financed with "jumbo" mortgages, which until recently were defined as loans over $417,000.

Sales financed with these larger loans, which the credit crunch made more expensive and harder to get, accounted for just 15 percent of Southland sales last month, down from about 40 percent a year ago.

[This is the problem with medians. DQ explains it, but only in the ninth paragraph of their report.]

Even with their problems, however, DQs numbers can be useful. These should offer something for everyone, but some caution is in order.

Housing bears shouldn’t focus too much on the year over year numbers to the exclusion of some possible modest improvement from February to March.

Likewise, housing bulls should be wary of reading too much into what might just be a normal seasonal increase in activity and prices (see “Southern California’s 2 housing market cycles“).

Over the past 20 years Southland sales have risen by an average of 38 percent between February and March. Last month’s 18.1 percent increase from February was the lowest in DataQuick’s statistics, which go back to 1988.

We don’t think today’s DQ numbers will change our own position on what’s ahead (See “A change in our projections?” for our April 4 projection post, or our “classic” November post on this market, “How low will prices go?“)

DQs report is available here. You might also want to check out Peter Hong’s concise, well-written article on today’s DQ numbers.

For a little longer term perspective, you might want to click back to either of our last two posts, (”A little more perspective”) and (”A little perspective“).

(4/15/08)  Yesterday’s paper brought an uplifting story that helped put our real estate woes in perspective.

Today’s paper was a little more brutal. “The Next Big Quake: Big One Nearly Certain by 2038,” screamed the Register. The Times was a bit gentler: “Likelier here: the next Big One.”

Fortunately, I try to start each day with a something a little more inspiring. This year I’m reading through Wisdom for Today, a daily devotional by my Pastor, Chuck Smith.

Appropriately enough for April 15th, today’s devotional was taken from the Biblical book of Job.

It’s based on advice the troubled Job received from Eliphaz, a friend who had come to “comfort” Job in his distress. Possibly the oldest book of the Bible, Job could have been written yesterday for today’s California home owners.

Titled “Nothing + Nothing = Nothing,” today’s devotional is taken from Job 15:31, “Let him not trust in futile things, deceiving himself, for futility will be his reward.”

Here’s the first paragraph of “Pastor Chuck’s” thoughts on the passage:

“In his attempt to understand why God had stripped Job of all his possessions, Eliphaz reasoned that Job had foolishly put his trust in those possessions. Though Job had not done so, Eliphaz was right in speaking against the folly of those who are lulled into a deceptive sense of security by their wealth.”

Like maybe thinking Southern California real estate can only go up in value?

Bottom line, even if that were true, you still can’t take it with you!

1,500 years after Job, Jesus put it this way:

“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” (Matthew 6:19-21)

I find that last sentence especially interesting. Jesus’ reason for not focusing on material wealth wasn’t so much that “you can’t take it with you,” as that it will distract our hearts from far more important things. Things that are eternal, like our family, our neighbors, our character and God.

Hopefully the last few year’s “shake up” in Southern California real estate values or the coming “shake up” reported in today’s paper will help us all focus more on things that can’t be shaken.

Woke up this morning to one of those stories that makes you thankful for what you have. Even if it is going down in value.

Worth a read:

“Pride in A Paycheck”

There’s more to life than money. Way more.

Maybe it’s not going to get as bad as we’ve been thinking?

Seems like I woke up to nothing but good news today.

Let’s start in Tokyo, where this week Alan Greenspan, apparently fleeing the U.S. for his own protection, proclaimed that the housing bottom isn’t that far away.

The former Fed chairman told a banking conference there that he expects the drop in U.S. home prices will probably end early in 2009 as housing inventory is reduced.

Here’s the really good news (if you’re a homeowner, at least. Greenspan thinks “…it is very likely that home prices will stabilize well before that.”

Greenspan said that in spite of apparently taking off his rose colored glasses, because he also thinks that the damage from the subprime crisis won’t be fully apparent for months. He also called the current credit crisis the worst in 50 years.

A bottom this coming winter has been the most optimistic of our “most likely” scenarios. In fact, the ongoing increase in Southern California foreclosures had us thinking the bottom’s more likely at least two years off (see yesterday’s update to our most recent projections post).

We’re not saying we agree with Greenspan, who we think had a lot to do with getting us into this mess (see “How We Got Into This Mess” for details). But he does have an awful lot of experience, access to more data than I can imagine, and a lot more credibility than Gary Watts.

Then I go to check the O.C.Register’s Mathew Padilla’s “Mortgage Insider Blog” to discover he’s finding signs that the bottom might be behind us. Now that’s the most optimistic scenario possible!

He sites two specific “signs:”

1. “Our local superstar investment manager, Bill Gross of Pimco, has been buying mortgages.“
2. Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein said the credit crisis is “closer to the end than the beginning,” and that the U.s. economy “will be on a growth curve again” by the end of the year.

Again, we’ve got two credible sources, but sources who may well have their own agendas.

Meanwhile, the Senate passed their version of the “Foreclosure Prevention Act” by a lopsided 84 - 12 vote. On first pass, we think the bill, which will probably be modified significantly in the House, does some things well, others poorly, and others not at all.

Overall, we think it’s a step in the right direction, and we feel the bipartisan support is significant, as well as the fast action. Here’s a link to today’s L.A. Times‘ article on the bill.

But foreclosures are still on the rise.

Like we keep saying, nobody really knows what’s next.

But today things look a little brighter than they did yesterday.

Maybe.

P.S. For something more uplifting, you might want to check out our next post, “A little perspective.”

Default Research, Inc. has posted their California county by county foreclosure numbers for March, and So Cal county numbers are pretty much up across the board to the highest numbers yet for the current downturn.

This report is made up primarily of Notice of Defaults (NODs), the first step in the 4 month foreclosure process. It sounds like the number of bank owned (REO) homes coming on the market will continue to increase well into fall throughout Southern California.

Bear in mind that filing for bankruptcy can add several months to that 4 month process, and additional time is required by the lender to gain occupancy and then make any needed repairs. So these NODs reported for March will be coming on the market as REOs no earlier than July, and well into fall. Of course, not all NOD properties end up foreclosed. (For tips on buying foreclosures, click here: “Foreclosure Tips.”)

But there’s a big “if.” One of the unknowns is what will end up in the Housing Relief Act currently working it’s way through Congress. If Congress gets it right, that could dramatically reduce the number of homes actually taken back by the banks.

We’re hoping Congress and/or the lenders come up with a reasonable program to allow qualified owners to hold onto their homes, but we’re not exactly holding our breath, either. We think debt relief for qualified buyers primarily provided by their lender in exchange for concessions by Congress and the borrower could significantly mitigate the impact of all these foreclosures on the market, but I’m starting to sound like Bernanke, which is really scary!

So I’ll leave what Congress might do for another post, except to say two things:

1. Some home owners who bought with subprime 100% liar loans that really have no business owning property.
2. We are at some risk of another Great Depression caused by the current crisis, and if some unworthy homeowners and lenders are helped in the process of saving the rest of us, so be it. When my lifeboat’s sinking, I prefer to focus on bailing it out rather than arguing about who got us into the mess. “Blessed are the merciful. . . ” wasn’t my idea, but it saves a lot of grief in the long run.

Bottom line: Looks like the bottom for prices is still a ways off, maybe a long ways. Like Freddie Mac’s Chief Economist told us last October, we’re in uncharted territory, and nobody really knows what’s going to happen next (see “How Low Will Prices Go?“).

That said, we’re still sticking to our best guess that prices are most likely to hit bottom either this December or next (see our most recent projections post, “A Change in Our Projections?”

BTW, this market is troubled, but not dead. We just put our last listing into escrow in 3 days last week. Like we keep saying, it’s not rocket science (see “How to Sell Your So Cal Home for Top Dollar in 30 Days“).

Default Research uses actual visits to the court houses to collect their data, which should make it more accurate and more timely than most other foreclosure reporting services. If you want to look directly at their charts for every county in California going back to 2006, just click here. We also have a direct link to their “California N.O.D. (Foreclosure) Stats” under “Great Links” near the top of our right sidebar.

You will see each Southern California county had a new record for NODs in March, with one anomaly. Most lenders do not file NODs over the Christmas holiday period. (I’ve been told that’s because lenders really aren’t total Scrooges, but I suspect it may also be because they take some time off then.) So you will notice NODs were down about 50% across the board for December, but up about 50% for January. That’s why some counties show higher numbers for January than for March–but not if you average the two winter months.

Stay tuned for more breaking news as our adventure in So Cal real estate continues. . . .

In the meantime, forward to our next post, “Let’s Go Ducks!”, for something a little more positive. We hope.