An upbeat revision of on our Southern California home price projections

(July 25, 2008)  Let’s start off by reiterating that this is risky business. There are lots of variables that could change in the months ahead, from interest rates to employment to the international scene. That’s why we continue to insist that nobody can predict the bottom with absolute certainty, as Freddie Mac’s chief economist Frank Northaft told us last fall. (See “How low will prices go?“)

Be that as it may, everybody wants to take their best guess at what’s coming next, and recent developments are making us think it may be time to update our projections.

The Housing Relief Bill

A big reason for our increasing optimism is President Bush’s pragmatic decision this week to accept $3.9 billion for cities to buy up and fix foreclosed properties as a trade-off for federal guarantees for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which should calm both the stock market and stabilize lending.

Although the additional deficit spending the bill may create will put some more upward pressure on interest rates, we do think it will go a long ways to reducing the glut of foreclosures.  On the whole it seems to be a surprisingly good example of well-crafted, bipartisan legislation.

Besides the money to buy up foreclosures, other features in the bill that we like include:

    1. A permanent increase in loan limits for Fannie, Freddie, and FHA to $625,000 in the highest cost areas like much of Southern California.

    2. A “tax credit” (which is repaid over fifteen years interest free) of  up to $7,500 for first time buyers who close escrow between 4/9/08 and 7/1/09.  (Although the credit phases out for joint filers with income over $150,000 and individual filers over $75,000, Blair & I think this will increase demand significantly, especially early in 2009.   In fact, we’ll break with our normal procedure here and actually recommend first time buyers contact us now so we can set them up with a personalized “web portal” which allows them to search, save, and categorize properties on the SoCal Multiple Listing Service.  562.822.SOLD.)

    3. $11 billion in tax free municipal bond authority for states to set up low interest loans to first time buyers.

    4. It tightens regulations to avoid future repeats of the recent mortgage meltdown.

    5. Making FHA mortgages more available, especially for “work outs” of over encumbered (”upside down”) borrowers who qualify and whose lenders will participate by writing down the loan to 90% of the home’s current market value (details in the article below).

    6. The complex but intriguing arrangement that encourages loan workouts instead of foreclosures or “short sales.”  The lender reduces the loan amount to 10% below current market value in exchange for getting the loan off their books.  The borrower agrees to share that 10% and future equity with the taxpayers.  And we the taxpayers (also known as the government) guarantee the new loan through FHA, provided the buyer can qualify.

The total revised package is expected to sail through the Senate and Bush has now promised to sign it.  While dangers of inflation and unemployment still threaten, we think the housing bill will have a more positive impact than we originally thought.  Combine that with the fact that the market seems to be finding a bottom in terms of price, and we’re hopeful the positives will outweigh or at least neutralize the negatives of the normal summer slowdown, foreclosures, and shaky employment.

With that in mind, we’re now revising our projections as follows:

Our Current Best “Guestimate”

40% chance: Bottom sometime between now and the end of winter:

We think the limited time offer of $7,000 tax credits for first time buyers will provide a significant stimulus to a market where we’re already seeing multiple competing offers on well-priced bank REOs.  At the same time, cities will begin bidding for some foreclosures, and others will see favorable workouts with the lenders which the bill makes possible.

Some of the bills provisions don’t kick in until October, but the tax relief is retroactive.  We think the bottom will most likely coincide closely with our normal seasonal cycle, which bottoms in December or January.  (We’re talking about escrows that open in December or January, which would close in February or March be reported by DataQuick a couple weeks later.  See “Predictions 101: Our 2 market cycles” and “Two big problems with DataQuick’s monthly median price reports.“)   However, it’s possible that the bottom may actually come earlier.

Of course, nobody will know for sure it’s a bottom until prices start rising in the months following.  Then we’ll be wondering if it’s a false bottom through the following winter.

Which So Cal County will bottom first? All real estate is local, and we think Southern California’s Coastal Plane will hit the bottom first, followed by the desert and Inland Empire areas possibly a year later.  This is due to the impact of gas prices on outlying areas plus overbuilding and more foreclosures there.  Of the larger So Cal counties, we expect Orange County home prices to bottom first because it’s the most built-out and has the lowest percentage of starter homes.  We expect either Los Angeles or San Diego County home prices to hit bottom next, followed by Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

Of the smaller counties, Santa Barbara looks like it’s already bottomed, with June foreclosures there hitting a 14 month low.  Ventura County homes may be nearing a price bottom, while the smaller inland counties are largely in the same boat as the Inland Empire.

The other 60%: There are at least three challenges to a bottom this winter:

  1. Inflation pushing interest rates up and reducing affordability.
  2. The economic slowdown that we seem to be entering, with major job losses in automotive, construction, finance and real estate.
  3. The continuing onslaught of foreclosures and resulting REOs.

40% chance: Bottom next winter. If the economy stabilizes and foreclosures slow down by year’s end, we could hit a bottom this winter. This is still the most common pick by most economists–recovery sometime in 2010, and has been consistently for the past year. We think the recent sharp decline in prices may speed things up. What would help even more would be a resumption of safe oil drilling offshore and in Alaska, with an excess profits tax being used to spur energy alternatives industries.

Again, we’re talking about the Coastal Plane areas of L.A. Orange and possibly San Diego Counties, with the Inland Empire and desert regions bottoming sometime in the following 14 months.

20% chance: Bottom later than next winter. Either a lengthy recession, or a bottom late winter of 2010-2011.

What to Do?

We still think market timing shouldn’t be as important as your personal situation in making housing or maybe even investing decisions. (See “What to do when nobody knows what’s next.”)

Sellers: Act now or be prepared to wait–maybe several years.

Buyers: There’s a significant chance that what we’re seeing now is as low as prices are going to go.  But we’re saying there’s an equal chance that the bottom won’t hit until a year from this winter.  And we’re also saying nobody can know for sure.

If you’re in a position to buy, start looking now & if you see something that works for you, make an offer at a price you can afford.  You can use the MLS links in the right hand column to directly access any MLS in Southern California.

As a minimum, buyers should start saving your down payment (new concept, I know–check out wikipedia or google it) and get your credit in order (another new concept for some of us, but necessary now.) Do your Christmas shopping & card writing now, & see how the economy’s doing in November–it may be time to start writing lowball offers. Or to wait another year.

Although predicting a 40% chance of a bottom in the next five months hardly echos NAR’s “buy now!” theme, it’s dramatically more optimistic than we were just a few weeks ago.  Of course, new developments could reduce or encourage our optimism.   Stay tuned, & we’ll keep giving you our best projections based on what we’re reading, what we’re seeing on the front lines, & our experience of over 30 years in this amazing, interesting, and unpredictable business.

What Would Really Help

The “Housing Bailout Bill” seems like a pretty good example of Congressional give-and-take for the common good.  We think there are two logical but somewhat radical additional steps our politicians need to take now to protect our economy and our way of life:

1.  Modest steps to federal deficit reduction, specifically, reducing “pork.” I’m thinking of wasteful spending to get Legislators re-elected, like Alaska’s famous “Bridge to Nowhere.” Passing a bill eliminating such Congressional “earmarks” and also giving the next president a line-item veto would be a very simple step in the right direction.  I’d also favor a mandatory deficit reduction bill that would impose across-the-board spending cuts and tax increases if our politicians couldn’t come up with budgets that meet a long term schedule to reduce the federal deficit.  Taxing our great grandkids is the ultimate in “taxation without representation,” which our forefathers rightly considered tyranny.

2.  Reduce the trade deficit by allowing careful new drilling for oil, but with a catch.  The U.S. is sitting on more untapped oil reserves than any country in the world. I say use the revenue from that oil to create the best clean, renewable energy industries in the world.  Open up more areas for safe drilling but dramatically increasing leasing fees on federal lands. Then split the billions in increased federal revenue between federal deficit reduction and renewable energy innovations.

That would undoubtedly strengthen the dollar, stimulate the economy, reduce the trade deficit, and lead  to a cleaner environment.  In the case of Alaska’s Arctic refuge, drilling would sacrifice less than .01% of ANWR to actual exploration in return for a $137 - $327 billion reduction in our trade balance (see Wikipedia, “Artic Refuge drilling controversy.”)   We can keep sending our the money to the Saudis, or keep it here and use it for high paying jobs, deficit reduction, and energy innovations.  Seems like a no-brainer to me, but I am a Realtor. . . .

We welcome your questions or comments

Tags: , ,

6 Responses to “An upbeat revision of on our Southern California home price projections”

  1. Vespatian Says:

    Undoubtedly the most contradictory, wishy washy so-called analysis I have ever read.

  2. Dave Emerson Says:

    Vespatian–

    Always appreciate a comment, even when you disagree.

    The most contradictory & wishy washy is a pretty high standard–I’m not even a politician or a lawyer. Maybe I should be?

    Actually, if I was that contradictory, you should have found something to agree with!

    Seriously, when there are lots of conflicting currents, I think it’s best not to pretend to know more than you do. My crystal ball fogged up about three years ago, & it’s still in the shop. Funny thing–everybody else from Ford Motor Co. to the Federal Reserve seemed to experience the same problem.

    I’m jut saying I’m seeing some glimmers of light at the end of the tunnel.

    Hopefully it’s not an oncoming train!

  3. francisco salinas Says:

    I think you are way off. I see more financial institutions folding, more writedowns, and lending constricting. The $7500 credit which needs to be repaid in 15 years or when you sell your house in one lump sum is not enough to stimulate the housing market. We are nowhere near bottom. The bottom will come when banks start flowing smoothly again and that can take a while. The feds are doing what they can to help this transition but the problem is much bigger than that. Americans are in debt, the United States is in debt, a blank check from the feds will not solve evrything, we need new legislation, more foreign investment and more importantly we need to change our way of thinking. Even when this market bottoms you can forget about it appreciating at a normal rate. It will be a slow upward climb.

  4. National Bubble Says:

    Realtor Dave says: “A tax credit of up to $7,500 for first time buyers who close escrow between 4/9/08 and 7/1/09.”

    But Dave is not telling his readers that you only get the tax credit if your adjusted gross income is less than 75K for single or 150K for married couples (which right there excludes a large portion of OC home buyers)

    Also, Dave is not telling his readers that the tax credit has to be paid back (interest free) in 15 years so you are just getting an interest free loan and if you sell the house within 15 years you have to pay the loan back right away.

    Dave, I’m disappointed to see that you are exploiting the housing bill to try to trick more suckers into buying homes. If you are going to talk about the tax credit on your site, you should at least tell people the whole truth. Not telling the whole truth is what got us in this housing mess to begin with. I can see that you realtors never learn.

  5. dutchtrader Says:

    I think when we bottom has to do with how much more price declines we have left.

  6. Blair Newman and Dave Emerson Says:

    Francisco and Bubble,

    Always appreciate a reader taking the time to post a comment. This interactivity is one of the best things about the web.

    Actually, when I wrote this post last Friday details were still coming out on the housing bill. I checked several sources on the tax credit, and none mentioned the pay-back provision on it, and I do want to thank you both for calling it to my attention.

    In fact, when I first read francisco’s comment I thought he must be confusing it with the payback part of the loan refinance component of the bill.

    But the Detroit Free Press confirms the details you both shared, and we’ve already added them to the description of the tax credit in the post above.

    That’s another thing I love about electronic media–changes at the speed of light. Compared to reprinting & remailing newsletter–there’s no comparison!

    The payback certainly reduces the impact of the credit, but doesn’t eliminate it. It’s still very helpful for most full time buyers to have a 15 year interest-free loan.

    BTW, we don’t think it’s such a bad idea for the credit to be paid back over time. Methinks it’s another of the positive compromises in the bill. Amazing what can happen when a crises forces our two parties to work together.

    While the phaseout of the credit for high income taxpayers would lessen the incentive for a few higher end buyers, in our experience the vast majority of first time buyers in Southern California have combined incomes well below $150,000. And buyers in that income range have less need of a $7,500 tax free loan anyway. Again, we think that’s a prudent provision and we applaud it.

    BTW, Bubble, if I was really trying to “trick suckers into buying homes,” would I be telling them there’s a 60% chance the bottom is a year or more away.

    Whether people agree with us or not, Blair and I try to always present the truth as we see it on this site, based on our 30+ years’ experience and what we see every day on real estate’s front lines.

    I don’t think anyone has built a referral-based business over 30 years by lying to people! And even if someone had, it would still be wrong!

    What we’re basically saying is, the future’s uncertain, the housing bill is a step in the right direction and the bottom might be closer than a lot of people think. Or not.

    So, when nobody really knows what’s next, personal considerations need to be given at least as much weight as speculative market timing consideration.

    If you find a home you love in a good location at a price you can afford with a 30-year fixed loan, and you’re not going to be moving any time soon, now might be a good time to pull the trigger & buy it. Because nobody really knows what’s going to happen next. Even those who think they do.

Leave a Reply

All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2008 Design by StyleShout and Clazh