Bailout Bill Problems
Posted in Market Trends and Projections, perspective | By Blair Newman and Dave Emerson | Tags: Business, Mortgage relief bill, Southern California Real Estate, subprime mortgage mess
Today the Wall Street Journal reported that Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) and his committee’s ranking Republican, Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama have reached an “agreement in principal” that could lead to senate approval of their own version of Barny Frank’s $300 billion dollar mortgage relief bill.
You may recall our post ten days ago about Ben Bernanke’s seeming support of such a bill.
While we are supportive of some of the many things included in Frank’s bill, there are huge problems which we hope our Senators are wise enough to correct.
- It makes no sense to bail out loans that never should have been made and that will ultimately fail regardless of temporary bailouts. There’s plenty of blame to go around for the subprime crisis (see “How we got into this mess“), some goes to borrowers who lied about their income, other to lenders willing to make no down home loans to borrowers with Fico scores so low I wouldn’t have accepted them as renters, let along borrowers. In either case, there’s no sense in putting off the inevitable for borrowers who never should have become homeowners.
- It makes no sense to reward and encourage irresponsibility. It’s really up to the borrower to read and understand the loan documents, not to just “trust our agent,” who probably hasn’t read them either.
- Let’s not punish tens of millions of responsible homeowners who are also taxpayers by forcing them to shoulder billions of potential losses to bail out less responsible homeowners.
In fairness, many subprime borrowers were duped by mortgage brokers who were often also real estate agents, eager to make a commissions for both the sale and the loan. I’ve heard tales of some agents employing full time “signers” to supply signatures on loan applications and documents. Many others simply trusted agents who spoke their language to correctly explain the various English documents. The documents are indeed overwhelming. I usually scan loan docs that I sign, but rarely do I read every word of every page.
The other day as Barb & I were out for an evening stroll we passed a home which had recently been foreclosed and then sold. The buyers paid about $200,000 less than the former owners had paid almost three years ago. They had moved in, and we noticed new kitchen cabinets stacked in the garage, no doubt waiting installation.
This was not a subprime loan gone bad, just a case of a buyer who bought at the peak and then decided to accept a job transfer as prices were declining. They picked a really friendly Realtor whose child was on the same soccer team as theirs (see”Top 10 ways NOT to pick a real estate agent“). The agent allowed them to overprice the home, then chase the market down, then take it off the market and rent it until their considerable equity was gone.
Sad for the borrower, sad for the lender, good for the buyer. Kind of a cleansing and a fresh start, ultimately for everyone. Not the end of the world. Nobody died. The sun’s still coming up. Lender and borrower made their choices and lived with the consequences. And the American taxpayer didn’t have to bail anyone out.
Worse things could happen. Rep Frank’s bailout bill, unless modified by the Senate, might be one of them.
Tags: Business, Mortgage relief bill, Southern California Real Estate, subprime mortgage mess