<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Details on the Housing &amp; Mortgage Relief Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News and Perspective from the Front Lines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:59:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamont Dorrance</title>
		<link>http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-152281</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont Dorrance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/?p=213#comment-152281</guid>
		<description>Most of the comments here are not content related, so I suggest to the poster to filter a non-spam comments. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the comments here are not content related, so I suggest to the poster to filter a non-spam comments. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FB Timeline</title>
		<link>http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-130827</link>
		<dc:creator>FB Timeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/?p=213#comment-130827</guid>
		<description>In hindsight, it looks like this plan of Obama&#039;s isn&#039;t working out that well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In hindsight, it looks like this plan of Obama&#8217;s isn&#8217;t working out that well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Emerson</title>
		<link>http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/?p=213#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Pamela,

Re 1099s:  I&#039;m not a lawyer or a CPA, but it&#039;s my understanding that the income tax for mortgage relief is being waived for some sellers for 2008.  If the home&#039;s your personal residence and it&#039;s your purchase loan that&#039;s foreclosing and the bank takes it back before year-end, I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;ll be OK, but you really should have an attorney or tax person familiar with the law review your specific situation.

As for the deficiency judgment, that&#039;s a whole different matter, as I understand it, and varies from state to state, so I doubt that would be covered by a federal law.  In California, I can&#039;t remember encountering a lender who went for a deficiency judgment after a routine foreclosure on a personal residence.  That&#039;s more common on commercial loans for larger properties.  Generally, the lender&#039;s recourse is only to the real property.

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pamela,</p>
<p>Re 1099s:  I&#8217;m not a lawyer or a CPA, but it&#8217;s my understanding that the income tax for mortgage relief is being waived for some sellers for 2008.  If the home&#8217;s your personal residence and it&#8217;s your purchase loan that&#8217;s foreclosing and the bank takes it back before year-end, I&#8217;m pretty sure you&#8217;ll be OK, but you really should have an attorney or tax person familiar with the law review your specific situation.</p>
<p>As for the deficiency judgment, that&#8217;s a whole different matter, as I understand it, and varies from state to state, so I doubt that would be covered by a federal law.  In California, I can&#8217;t remember encountering a lender who went for a deficiency judgment after a routine foreclosure on a personal residence.  That&#8217;s more common on commercial loans for larger properties.  Generally, the lender&#8217;s recourse is only to the real property.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Mendoza</title>
		<link>http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/details-on-the-housing-mortgage-relief-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Mendoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socalrealestatenews.com/blog/?p=213#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Is it true that on December 2007, President Bush signed a bill preventing Mortgage companies from taking court action (deficiency judgement suit) against people who had lost their homestead in Foreclosure? nor give them a 1099 form for the amount of this deficiency so that they will have to pay it in taxes?

Please advise.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that on December 2007, President Bush signed a bill preventing Mortgage companies from taking court action (deficiency judgement suit) against people who had lost their homestead in Foreclosure? nor give them a 1099 form for the amount of this deficiency so that they will have to pay it in taxes?</p>
<p>Please advise.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

