So Cal Real Estate News

(8/1/08) Frequent readers know Blair & I have been candid about what we don’t know during this amazing real estate market cycle here in Southern California. (See “How low will prices go?“)

But today, as I was looking through the Orange County Register’s Friday new homes advertising section, it suddenly hit me:

Prices on most So Cal new construction have either already hit bottom, or will be hitting bottom between now and December 26.

So, if you’ve always wanted to live in a new home, I suggest you start doing your research now.

Why now?

Simple:  Supply and demand.  New home permits have been way down for over a year now.  Most developers may be as addicted to building as a drug addict is to dope, but they aren’t crazy.  And even if they are, their bankers aren’t.  There just isn’t that much additional inventory coming onto the market.

In most segments, we’re in the final phases of a clearance sale, and the stores haven’t been ordering new inventory for some time.  Essentially, they’re going of business–some permanently, others temporarily.  And the “going out of business sale” is winding down.

Exactly which new construction?

In the developed areas of Orange, San Diego and Los Angeles Counties, the lower end of new construction will probably hit bottom first, as may also be the case in resales.  That would include almost all starter homes, especially condo/townhomes/lofts and “C” neighborhood detached homes.  As Lyon Homes reported today, the lower end homes are now the bulk of their sales, allowing them to sell out these tracts earlier.

In the outlying areas, it’s a bit trickier due to the impact of high commuting costs and economic problems from the building slowdown itself.  The areas with shorter commutes will most likely bottom first.  High end, move-up tracts may have further down to go as well.  Do your homework and look for desperate builders or whole tracts that are now bank-owned.

What about resales?

The glut of bargain basement new homes needs to be cleared out to stabilize resales, so this would be a step in the right direction.  There are two additional problems facing resale housing:

1. The glut of foreclosures and “short sales,” especially on the low end.
2. The lack of the normal buyers for move-up homes, because most owners of starter homes either already moved up during the boom or else have had their equity disappear during the plunge.  For example, last weekend we held open a beautiful Los Alamitos five bedroom, three bath pool home. Over 50 people came through, and most of them fell in love with the home.  Unfortunately,  almost all of the potential buyers had another home they needed to sell first.  In most cases, that home had been taken off the market because they couldn’t sell it at a price that they felt they needed to make the move, including one family that was making a lateral move back to California from Florida.  (The first Florida summer will do that for you!)  Same problem that Lyons is having with move-up homes.  On the flip side, prices have been “stickier” on most move-up resales, due to both a lack of competition from foreclosures and the ability of their sellers to wait out the downturn.

For resales, we’re sticking for now with our latest projections (see”An optimistic update on our projections of a home price bottom“).  In short, we think the odds are for a bottom either this coming winter or next, but it’s too close call as to which.

What to do?

• If you’ve got your heart set on a new home, start looking now and be ready to close before year’s end.
• If a resale will do, get your “ducks in a row” by figuring out what you’ll qualify for and what your home might sell for if you’re moving up, or if you’d be better off refinancing out your down payment now and renting it out.  (You’d need to close escrow on it within 3 years of moving out or you lose your tax free $250,000/$500,000 exclusion of capital gains.)  This winter should be good–prices have already dropped more than I’ve ever seen in my 28 years as a Realtor and broker.   But prices might be better in winter of ‘09-’10.

We think the deciding factor should be your personal situation.  For more, check out our classic post on “What to do when nobody knows what’s next.”  Of course, we’ll try to answer any question you leave in the form of a comment below.  You can also feel free to go to “About Us” and scroll to the last few lines to get our phone numbers, or simply put “contact me please” in the comment section below (click the word “comments” below if there’s no box to complete).

Times of great opportunity are ahead.  For many new home buyers, they’ve already arrived, and quite possibly for resale buyers as well.  Praying for wisdom might be a good place to start!

(7/30/08) Back on April first of this year, while debate was raging on the bill, we wrote a post titled “Major housing breakthrough near?“  It included the following:

It looks like our leaders may finally be setting aside their egos and personal agendas to work together for the common good.

Behind-the-scenes discussions between Congressional leaders and the Bush administration may be about to bear fruit. And that fruit would be a pragmatic Housing Relief Act of 2008 which combines the best ideas from partisans of all stripes to provide both immediate relief and long term reform.

The comments off the record are almost unbelievable: “The collapse of the American housing and lending markets is an impending crisis that compels us to lay aside partisan differences and work together,” one Senate leader has discovered. “Ultimately, we’re all in the same boat, and if it sinks, we all drown!” she continued.

“We need to recognize that we are all on the same team,” according to a key administration figure. “We need to stop acting like the Shaq and Kobe Lakers and start acting like this year’s UCLA Bruins. You don’t see Collison and Love fighting for the ball!”

The details are still being finalized, but they involve major concessions and some unique innovations from both sides of the aisle.

We meant it as an April Fool’s post!

Turned out, the joke was on us, & we’re glad!

While the bill’s far from perfect, it includes a lot of positives, from increased oversight of the mortgage giants Fannie, Freddie, to tax credits for first time buyers for a limited time.

What’s especially significant is the numerous compromises it took to get the bill through Congress.  For example, that first time buyer tax credit ended up being an interest free loan that has to be paid back over fifteen years.  Stimulus for housing now, partial payback for the taxpayers later.

Many housing bears are eager for values to fall more, even if it does ruin the nation’s economy and banking system.  Their hatred for this bill might be evidence they fear it just might work.

We think it’s a step in the right direction.  Maybe several steps.  The bottom of this crash is at least a little closer today than it was yesterday.  On our latest projections post, we increased the probability of a bottom within the next seven months by 5% directly as a result of this bill.  Hopefully, we’re being conservative.  (That post also lists some of the additional beneficial features of the bill.)

Thanks to those leaders in D.C. that finally realized that ultimately, as Americans, we’re all on the same team!

Just as the National Association of Realtors’ forecasts tend to be overly optimistic (see this morning’s post), Chapman University’s tend to be quite pessimistic. I think they’re still mad that Gary Watts made them look foolish several years in a row, or it could just be something inherent in their system.

Anyway, as part of their coming June “comprehensive forecast of key economic variables,” Chapman’s Economic Research Center today released their projection of Los Angeles County, Orange County, and Inland Empire housing prices based only on one variable, affordability.

To reach the historical average affordability rate, Chapman says L.A.County median home prices need to fall an additional 23.3% and Orange County by another 13.7%. The Inland Empire, which has had the more severe overbuilding and foreclosure rates, need “only” fall another 8.2% to reach Chapman’s magical median.

Now for the bad news:

“It is likely that home prices will decline even more . . . since corrections usually drop the affordability index below the historical mean.”

Their math assumes modest income increases and flat interest rates. Declining rates could significantly decrease the amount of “correction” needed, while more modest pay increases could offset at least some of that.

I think historical trends in L.A. and Orange Counties are skewed by many years of affordable land. Today’s situation of being practically built out on the coastal plain should result in higher affordability rates, in our opinion. That doesn’t totally invalidate Chapman’s conclusions–we’d just pick more modest numbers. We’re also hopeful that continue declines in mortgage rates will increase affordability.

It seems to us that both Chapman University and Gary Watts are like broken clocks. Gary’s stuck at sunrise: He always thinks prices will keep going up. Chapman’s stuck at midnight: The worst is yet to come. They’re both right once in each economic cycle, like a broken 24-hour clock that’s right once a day.

Still it’s one more thing to consider. We think a 5% - 10% additional price drop will hopefully do it for the coastal plain at least. (See “A Change in Our Projections“).

Like we keep saying, nobody knows for sure (See “How Low Will Prices Go?”).

For Chapman’s full report, including some nifty charts, in PDF form, click here.

And click here for “a little perspective” on our real estate woes, here for “a little more perspective,” here to find out “what to do when nobody knows what’s next,” or here to find out “how to sell your So Cal home for top dollar in 30 days.”

As for me, I think it’s time to get outside in this beautiful weather & go for a jog.

Update from David Emerson: We wrote the following post early 4/15, in anticipation of DataQuick’s release of their March closing statistics for all of Southern California, including L.A. & Orange Counties, Lakewood, Long Beach, Los Alamitos, and the surrounding area. As we predicted, DQ’s March numbers showed an increase in sales which was quite modest by seasonal standards, and also a modest firming in prices.

We’ll insert excerpts from today’s DQ report at appropriate points through the post below. We’ll indent them & put them in italics. We’re leaving our earlier projections and commentary unchanged, because it’s still applicable:

“DataSlow,” as we like to call them, should be out today with their March closing statistics for Southern California. Here’s our preview & interpretation. We’ll update this as needed once the numbers are out.

Data quick reports Southern California two statistics every week and every month: sales volume and median sales price.

It looks like both will be down from March 2007, which will probably get most of the attention. But the month over month figures should be more hopeful.

We expect sales volume to be up a tad from February,

[Here's what DQ reported:] A total of 12,808 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties in March. That was up 18.8 percent from 10,777 the previous month but down 41.4 percent from 21,856 in March 2007.

and median prices to be pretty close to February’s numbers.

The median price paid for a Southland home was $385,000 last month, the lowest since $380,000 in April 2004. Last month’s median was down 5.6 percent from February’s $408,000, and down a record 23.8 percent from $505,000 in February 2007. That peak median of $505,000 was reached several times last spring and summer.

[Dave here. This is still a reduction in the rate of decline, and it was caused by some of the problems with median statistics, details below. When isolated by county, the stabilization is more apparent. For example, Orange County's March median of $506,000 was down less than 3% from February's OC DQ median of $520,000. More significantly, OC's $506k March median was actually up from DQs last 4 week OC reports, which both came in at $500,000. Pretty much what we predicted--but don't read too much into that, bulls (details to follow)

Now a word about what that would mean.

It's important to bear in mind what these numbers actually are. First, in terms of today's rapidly moving market, DQs numbers are ancient history. That's because Data Quick today will report Southern California real estate sales that closed escrow during March.

That means the purchase offer was most likely written 45-60 days earlier: Someplace between January 1 and February 14.

Second, DQ's price numbers are medians. If more homes are selling in stater neighborhoods, the median price will drop even if prices are rising. (For a more detailed discussion of the problems with DataQuick's numbers, see "Two big problems with DataQuick's median prices.")

The sharp and sudden drop of the Southland median price reflects a combination of factors, mainly depreciation, especially in areas hammered by foreclosures, and a big shift in the types of homes selling. Since last August, when the continuing credit crunch hit, sales have plunged for more expensive homes financed with "jumbo" mortgages, which until recently were defined as loans over $417,000.

Sales financed with these larger loans, which the credit crunch made more expensive and harder to get, accounted for just 15 percent of Southland sales last month, down from about 40 percent a year ago.

[This is the problem with medians. DQ explains it, but only in the ninth paragraph of their report.]

Even with their problems, however, DQs numbers can be useful. These should offer something for everyone, but some caution is in order.

Housing bears shouldn’t focus too much on the year over year numbers to the exclusion of some possible modest improvement from February to March.

Likewise, housing bulls should be wary of reading too much into what might just be a normal seasonal increase in activity and prices (see “Southern California’s 2 housing market cycles“).

Over the past 20 years Southland sales have risen by an average of 38 percent between February and March. Last month’s 18.1 percent increase from February was the lowest in DataQuick’s statistics, which go back to 1988.

We don’t think today’s DQ numbers will change our own position on what’s ahead (See “A change in our projections?” for our April 4 projection post, or our “classic” November post on this market, “How low will prices go?“)

DQs report is available here. You might also want to check out Peter Hong’s concise, well-written article on today’s DQ numbers.

For a little longer term perspective, you might want to click back to either of our last two posts, (”A little more perspective”) and (”A little perspective“).

The Wall Street Journal released their quartlerly survey of housing-market conditions in 28 major U.S. metropolitan areas today, along with an analysis that’s rings true with what we’re seeing throughout our region.

 The article’s title pretty much sums it up:  “With Buyers Sidelined, Home Prices Slide.”  The survey itself reveals that what we’re experiencing locally is being repeated across the country, with some areas doing worse than us but more areas doing better. 

To see the complete article and the survey results, just click here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119326355265670448.html?mod=googlenews_wsj