Posts Tagged ‘Orange County real estate’

Who should buy Southern California real estate between now and Christmas

Saturday, August 30th, 2008

Note: Special 2 hour, $5 buyer seminar with Blair & Dave set for Saturday, October11 at Lakewood’s Mayfair Park (Clark and South St.). We designed this to help buyers make the most of this fall and winter’s unusual buying opportunites. Class size is limited to allow interaction. Sponsored by Lakewood’s Community Services Department. Details here. No, we’re not selling tapes, cds, books, or DVDs!

It wasn’t that long ago that Blair and I thought Southern California home prices were most likely to begin to rebound in spring of 2010.

Near the end of July we made an upbeat revision in our forecast, giving a 40% probability Southern California home prices would bottom this coming winter, a 40% chance of our price bottom coming the following winter, and a 20% of our bottom coming after that.  We also began specifying which areas and price segments can be expected to bottom first.  (For details and our rationale, check out “An optimistic update on our projections of a home price bottom.”)

Now we’re getting even a bit more optimistic, largely due to modest declines in homes going into foreclosure combined with the rapid decline in prices over the past year.

Nobody can say with certainty when Southern California home prices will hit bottom (See “How low will prices go?“).  DataQuick’s numbers won’t reflect that bottom until long after it’s passed (see “Two big problems with DataQuick’s monthly median price reports“).  However, there comes a time before the price bottom in every market cycle where the wise buyer starts looking very seriously.

I think that time is now.  In fact, last week I put in my first offer on a California property in over ten years.  (Last month I also decided to run for my local City Council for the first time ever, but that’s another story for another blog.)

Let’s take a close look at some questions this raises, including where, what, and why to buy now:

Where to buy now: While we believe recovery for the desert area and the Inland Empire may not come unti spring of 2010, we now believe the next four months are likely to present the best buying opportunities for most property classes in the coastal plane of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.

Why? As we’ve indicated in “Our Two R.E. Market Cycles,” in most years both sales volume and prices for homes going into escrow tend to bottom in November and December. People are too busy preparing for the holidays to buy homes but lenders and builders are trying to unload inventory before year’s end.  It’s almost like an annual “year end clearance” sale for real estate.

With the number of homes going into foreclosure beginning to decline and effects of the federal housing relief bill beginning to kick in (see “The good news about the ‘Housing and Economic Recovery Act’ “), we think the odds now are that this winter’s apt to be as good as it gets for buyers looking in the more built out areas of So Cal.

What’s more, interest rates are still near historical lows and are expected to gradually rise over the years ahead.  Very low prices and rates make for an excellent buying opportunity.

Finally, there are literally hundreds of thousands of buyers sitting on the fence right now waiting for the market to bottom.  Once they all sense the time is right, you’ll have far more competition from other buyers than you have right now.  If you’re not early, you’ll be late.   Once everybody recognizes a golden opportunity, it’s too late to take advantage of it.

Due to the annual cycle, we know activity’s apt to pick up starting 12/26, we think the prudent buyer should at least get her feet wet in the market now.

Who should buy now? Buyers who have fairly decent credit, access to a down payment of at least 3.5% (the new FHA minimum), stable income, and who aren’t planning on selling in the next five years.  (3-5 years used to be the rule of thumb for accumulating enough equity to cover selling costs.  1-2 year “flipping” for anything besides severely distressed property is probably a thing of the past.)  It’s also not a time for negative amortization loans, or adjustable mortgages with low teaser rates and payments that will rise dramatically.  We recommend 7 - 30 year fixed, fully amortizing loans.

What to buy now? We think lower end Single Family Homes (SFRs) will rebound first, as they’ve been driven down the most by foreclosures.  Starter condos, which were overbuilt more than SFRs in LA & OC, will probably lag behind.  Quite likely move-up homes will also lag, since most buyers need to build up equity in their current home in order to move up.

We also like the discounts available on “short sales.”

What’s a “short sale?” In a  “short sale” the current mortgage holder accepts a reduced, or “short” payoff at close in order to avoid foreclosure.  It actually takes longer than a normal sale or a bank foreclosure, and you can expect the current mortgage holder to attempt to renegotiate or even cancel the sale.  I got plenty of experience with short sales back during the 1991 - 1996 SoCal real estate crash, and so far Blair and I have closed every short sale we’ve opened.

Why the discount on short sales? For agents, short sales are twice the hassle for 1/6 less commission, since the mortgage holder always insists on reducing the commission as a condition of accepting the short sale, if they’re willing to accept it at all.  Buyers would also rather avoid the renegotiation hassles not to mention the chance of the current lender disallowing the losing the home 30 - 60 days into the escrow.  As a result short sales often go for 5% - 15% below market.  And market is already 25% - 40% below what it was at the peak.

What about foreclosures? Once the bank takes the home back, the hassles of a short sale and the reduced commission are both eliminated, so the demand increases.  Some REOs (”Real Estate Owned,” or lender-owned, foreclosed properties) are initially overpriced.  When an REO is underpriced, the lender may wait 7 - 10 days before accepting an offer, essentialy holding an auction so that the price will get bid up, sometimes actually selling above market.

When should I start looking? Preferably September or early October.  That way you’ll have time to look and to familiarize yourself with your options.  Some experts say you should look at 20 similar homes before making an offer.  With the internet, it’s not that hard.  You can search for yourself using the links to Southern California Multiple Listing services in the column to your right.  Better yet, we can set you up on the MLS’s “Listing Book,” which allows you to sort out the listings you prefer.  (Just shoot us an e-mail at BlairNewman at verizon.net.  (You know what the “at” represents, but most web-crawling e-mail harvesters don’t.)

It’s also good to start looking now so that if you find a short sale you like you’ll have time to give it a shot, & still have time to look and write other offers if the current lender plays hardball 45 days down the line.

What if prices continue to drop next year? We think the odds are against that, but nobody can say for certain.  What we do know is that prices have already fallen by about a third from the peak.  By staying in developped areas, you minimize the risk of dramatic additional falls.  Of course, if the economy takes a major turn for the worst while you’re looking, you can always wait.  Check back with us, or sign up for our RSS feed, to see our take on future developments.

How do we get started? First, talk to an honest, reliable lender (if you don’t know any, we do.  562.822.SOLD).  Find out what you qualify for on a fixed loan, if you need to work on your credit, how much down you’ll need, etc.

Then find an honest, experienced, diligent full-time agent.  Not someone you know at work (they’re not full-time, no matter what they say), probably not a relative, and not a friendly person you meet at an open house.  At least five years in the business, at least 50 closed sales, at least 5 of them in the neighborhood you’re interested in.   Again, with 30+ years in the business, we can probably find someone good for you if you can’t.  If you’re thinking southeast L.A. County (Long Beach, Lakewood, Norwalk, Cerritos, etc.) or west or North Orange County (Cypress, Rossmoor, Seal Beach through La Mirada and La Habra), we’ve got many years experience there ourselves, with over 500 homes sold.

You may decide you want to wait a little longer, but you may also find your dream home & be able to negotiate a great deal.  Whatever you finally decide, now’s a great time to get started.  There’s a very good chance it may be the smartest financial decision of your life!

Not as bad as it seems?

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

Real estate news is coming fast and furious! I take a weekend off from blogging for Barb’s birthday, & suddenly I’m hammered.

Several interesting items popped up over the last few days I found fascinating. In this post we’ll focus on the our own beloved California Association of Realtor’s headline-grabbing announcement that median prices are expected to drop 24% this year.  (Later, a look at remarks by the Fed’s Bernanke last night.)

It happened at the Disneyland hotel where our own Pacific West Board of Realtors was holding it’s spring “expo” and pep rally on Friday. Sadly, and ironically, as we local Realtors were meeting, a businessman decided to end it all by jumping from one of the hotel’s towers. Shades of the Great Depression. It is my understanding he was not a Realtor, surprisingly.

But some Realtors probably thought about joining him after they heard from CAR’s Deputy Chief Economist, Robert Kleinhenz, who revised the Association’s 2008 forecast for median home prices statewide. In March, CAR predicted a 9.5% drop for the year. Kleinhenz almost tripled that 9.5%, to a 24% drop. No wonder his boss, California Association of Realtor’s Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young, asked him to give the speech. (Leslie was the one out with 9.5% for the year in March, doubling her 4.5% October figure, which we thought was too conservative. Looks like when she ran the numbers again late in April, she just handed the sheet to poor Bob Kleinhenz on her way out the door to advise some poor businessman staying elsewhere in the hotel.)

But wait a minute–that may not be as bad as it seems. Dataquick’s most recent statewide median prices showed a 26% price drop for March 2008 from March 2007, which was when Dataquick’s price median peaked. Dataquick indicated “about half” of that drop was due to a shift in the market to more sales of lower priced homes. (For a detailed post on the problems with Dataquick’s median numbers, check out “Two big problems with DataQuick’s median prices.”)

So if you read between the lines, Kleinhenz, who apparently is playing “bad cop” to the missing Leslie Appleton-Young’s “good cop,” is implying that the worst is behind us. 2007 ended with CAR reporting a statewide median for Single Family homes of $476,000, and their latest number, for March 2008 is down to $414,000! (Click here for CAR’s press release on their March numbers) . That’s actually lower than the $424,000 median average for the year they’re now predicting.

As a 28 year CAR member, I picked up the phone to talk to old Bob himself, but discovered he was in Sacramento giving another speech today. Something about a statewide tour sponsored by Pierce Brothers Mortuary.

In any case, his capable associate, Oscar Wei was available to assist me, and he confirmed my suspicion that CAR now thinks the worst is behind us: “Hopefully, and that’s a lot of hope, things should be bottoming out soon in terms of price,” he told me.

That agrees with Oscar’s bosses comments last Friday at the resort formerly known as “The Happiest Place on Earth: “We do think this is the year we’re going to see our low point for sales. … Monthly sales have already bottomed out.” Also “All these numbers are going to stabilize and slightly improve. … We’re basically climbing above the liquidity crunch to pre-liquidity numbers.

Well, I may be paying Bob & Oscar’s salaries, but I’m not quite ready to eat their breadsticks. With homes entering foreclosure still increasing (see “So Cal defaults up again“), and the liquidity problem far from solved, Blair and I are still expecting additional declines in values and sales as we move through fall and winter (See “Predictions 101: Our 2 market cycles“).

That doesn’t mean now may not be a good time to buy if you’re in a position to do so.  Shoot, Bob & Oscar could well be right, and Dave & Blair wrong.  Well, Blair anyway.  In fact, we continue to believe that if you find a home you love at a payment you can live with on a 30 year fixed loan, and you don’t intend to move any time soon, at least write an offer on it.

But if you’re not yet in a position to buy, there’s no need to panic.  While sellers may be less motivated as prices firm, we’re not going to see double digit appreciation any time soon.  And there’s a good chance the bottom may still be a year or two away.

But nobody knows for sure, as we keep saying, much to the annoyance of some of our gentle readers.  (See “How low will prices go?

That’s what makes So Cal Real Estate so interesting.

What do you think’s next?

A Change in Our Projections?

Friday, April 4th, 2008

April 10 update: In the week since writing this post, the roller coaster ride of hopeful and negative news has continued unabated.

One thing that concerns us is this week’s release of California’s Foreclosure stats for March, however (see “So Cal Defaults Up Again & What it Means”). has got us reconsidering. But there are a couple hopeful possibilities we’re also keeping our eyes on. We’re watching to see what Congress might do next, and keeping another eye on the ever-surprising Fed.

So stay tuned for further developments. In the meantime, we still think this is as accurate a description of where we’re at & where we’re going as we can write. For now.

We concluded our last post (”Two Problems with DataQuick’s Median Prices,” with our observation that the actual drop in So Cal home values from top to current bottom is about 25 - 30% (less in higher end areas, more in condos, starter areas, and areas with lots of new construction).

The obvious question is, “How Much More Should So Cal Prices Have to Correct?”

25 - 30% may well be about the right amount of correcting–nobody knows for sure, as we keep saying (see “How Low will Prices Go?“).

But the market will almost certainly overcorrect, especially with all the current negativity, all the foreclosures still in process, and the difficulties getting mortgages continuing.

Ben Bernanke, the Fed Chairman, thinks governmental actions already in place will begin to kick in later this year, and things will slowly begin improving from there. He hopes, but he’s not sure. (See “Bernanke predicts bottom later this year” for excerpts from his Wednesday testimony with our English “translation”/summaries.) Remember, however, that part of his job seems to be keeping an optimistic spin going.

But UC San Diego’s Nobel Prize winning economist, Clive Granger, thinks the U.S. economy has already been in a recession for about four months. He expects the current recession to last an additional 2-6 months, depending on what occurs in the housing and financial markets. Like Bernanke, that puts the bottom later this year.

Slightly more pessimistic is Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft. (He was also the panelist from last October’s CAR Expo who formed the basis for our belief that nobody knows what will happen next with his remarks that “we’re in uncharted territory.”) (Obviously, that belief hasn’t stopped us from making our best guesses at what’s next.)

Maybe Dr. Nothaft now thinks the picture’s becoming a bit clearer. Last week he told a lunch audience that he expects that life should begin to return to the housing sector late this year or early next but says prices may not recover significantly until 2010.

Then this morning DataQuick released figures for OC showing prices were still dropping but sales volume is continuing to rise, as we’ve been predicting (see the Register’s R.E. blog for details). (Also bear in mind what we said yesterday about DataQuick’s numbers being several months behind, among other things.

Then this afternoon the Register blog put up another post quoting a South OC Realtor who does a lot of number crunching saying what we basically said a month ago, that activity’s picking up.

Now remember what we said about those two So Cal real estate market cycles on Wednesday. Annual cycle: up in the spring, down in the fall. Add in these predictions that the economic cycle may be nearing a bottom, and what do you get? Could it be we’ll hit bottom this winter, not a year later as we had been thinking?

Maybe, but what about today’s increase in unemployment to 5.1%, with economists particularly worried because the drop was so broadspread, no longer limited to housing and construction.

This morning I spoke with one broker I’ve known for 30 years about activity in his office. Yeah, he said, sales (opening of escrows) were up in February, but then they dropped a bit in March, and the last few weeks have been especially slow. The March slowdown he attributed to actual competition for houses, citing one agent who had presented 8 offers for one buyer who needed help with closing costs. There were enough competing offers and enough buyer activity that the sellers were no longer making those concessions.

The cause of the slowdown over the last two weeks , however, was harder to figure out. “Dave, there’s just so many cross currents,” he told me. “The market’s just in flux.”

That flux may mean that we’re nearing a bottom. Or it may mean the mini-upturn we saw in February and March is turning down.

Or it may just mean it’s still too early to tell what’s going on.

This post was intended to update our projections. So I looked up our most recent forecasting post, March 24’s “What’s Next for Southern California Housing.”

Here’s what we said in summary back then:

“We continue to expect a window of opportunity for sellers for the next several months, followed by opportunities for buyers through this winter. We still thing there’s a significant chance (20%?) of a major price collapse of an additional 15 - 25% , but there’s also a possibility that the worst is behind us.”

“Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something. up

Looks like there’s not a whole lot to update, although there are some things I might tweak:

  • That window of opportunity for sellers may already be starting to close.
  • An additional price decline of 5% - 10% through this winter is probably the most likely scenario, but by no means a certainty.
  • There’s a significant possibility that the market will bottom this winter, but it’s still to early to really know.
  • There’s also evidence that real estate’s woes may spread through the economy and pull prices down much further, into a recession that might last for years.
  • Washington is becoming increasingly proactive, which could be good. . . or bad, depending on what specific steps are taken.
  • One thing hasn’t changed at all:

Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something up.

What to do? Guess it’s time to again refer to our December 1 post, “What to do when nobody knows what’s next.”

Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something up.

We’d love to hear your thoughts, especially what you see happening in your corner of So Cal.

April 10 note: As of this morning, we’re beginning to think the bottom’s probably at least 20 months off, rather than the 8 we’ve been hoping for recently. Those foreclosure stats we mentioned really have us concerned, but we may be overreacting to one item. Because you never know for sure what’s going to happen next!

Two Big Problems with DataQuick Median Prices

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

In about ten days, there will be much media noise as DataQuick releases their So Cal median price figures for March.

We expect sales will be up from February, but down from March ‘06. Some analysts will be surprised. Prices will be down from a year earlier, but not down nearly as much as expected from a month earlier. In fact, the median price for Orange County might actually be up slightly from February.

But it’s not really news. And it’s not even what you think it is.

It’s not news because they’ll be reporting what took place back in January and early February, when those homes that closed in March actually went into escrow, as we explained in “Market Predictions 101: Our Two Real Estate Cycles.” By the time “DataSlow” reports them, they’ll be almost 3 months old.

“DataSlow’s” median price numbers aren’t what you think because any average, median or mean (for you mathematicians), can be skewed by shifts between market segments, as was so clearly pointed in a recent statistical study by Zillow’s number-cruncher.

For example, let’s say DataQuick started reporting “median grocery prices” at your local Vons. In November, when lots of people are buying expensive items like turkeys, that median would go up. Now the prices of things might actually be down (at least in our hypothetical, if not in the real world right now. Turkey might be cheaper than it was a month earlier. But because more people were buying turkeys instead of hamburger, the median price would still go up.

Same thing in the real estate market. When there are more first time, low end, buyers the median goes down. When there are more high end buyers, it goes down.

That’s why through most of 2006 DataQuick’s median price kept moving up, even as prices in most neighborhoods were dropping. As subprime loans stated to dry up, activity was switching from the low end to the middle and higher prices. So the median average moved up, since more of the sales were in higher priced neighborhoods, even as the prices in those neighborhoods fell.

More recently, there’s been an increase in lower end sales as lenders foreclose on many subprime borrowers in starter homes, then quickly unload the property at whatever price the market will bear. Meanwhile, most high end homeowners moved up and put a substantial down payment into their home, so there are far fewer foreclosures and distressed sales in the higher neighborhoods. Instead, those homeowners for the most part have decided to just wait out the current down turn.

In 2006, DataQuick’s median price was going up while actual prices were dropping in most neighborhoods. Lately, DataQuick’s median has been dropping faster than actual prices in most neighborhoods. We believe the actual drop in So Cal home values from top to current bottom is about 25 - 30% (less in higher end areas, more in condos, starter areas, and areas with lots of new construction).

In our next post, which should be out soon, we’ll combine that last little nugget of information with our Bernanke post and our Predictions 101 post to update our own predictions.

In the meantime, your thoughts and questions are always welcome. If there isn’t a “Leave a Comment” box below, then click on the “0 comments” or “2 comments” comment-counter just below this paragraph on the right. Make up a “Name” or just use your first name, as that will be public. Your e-mail will remain entirely confidential, but we can use it for a confidential response if requested. Thanks for visiting!

So Maybe It Wasn’t an April Fools’ Post?

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Talk about being out in front of a story!

Early April 1, before I went to the Westminster Justice Center for a day of Jury Duty (details later this week), we put up our most popular post yet, “Major Housing Breakthrough Near?

It looks like our leaders may finally be setting aside their egos and personal agendas to work together for the common good,” we wrote two days ago.

“Behind-the-scenes discussions between Congressional leaders and the Bush administration may be about to bear fruit. And that fruit would be a pragmatic Housing Relief Act of 2008 which combines the best ideas from partisans of all stripes to provide both immediate relief and long term reform.”

So guess what’s the top story on Los Angeles Times‘ website this morning? “Senate advances mortgage relief plan.”

Here are the first two paragraphs of today’s Times’ article:

WASHINGTON — Senate Democratic and Republican leaders reached agreement Wednesday on a multibillion-dollar package to address rampant foreclosures and other problems stemming from what may be the worst housing slump since the Great Depression.

The compromise measure, placed on a fast track by the election-year desire to mollify voters, could be approved by the Senate as early as this week. It would be the first significant intervention by federal lawmakers to aid victims of the mortgage crisis.

Looks like you heard it here first!

Now, we’re pleased with our reputation for honesty. Really (see Redfin’s post, “A Realtor We Can Trust“). So we’ll also have to disclose that we got a couple of “minor” details wrong near the end of our April 1 prophetic post.

Like Congress eliminating earmarks and passing a line-item veto and Bush cutting back on Iraq spending to help fund the bill. And the AARP agreeing to support a one year suspension of social security’s cost of living increase. And McCain picking Obama as his running mate in the midst of all the bipartisan unity.

But it was posted on April 1.

By that we mean, it took a couple of days for all the details to come out. Right?

Shoot, our first report on a pending bipartisan breakthrough on housing was posted on March 31 (”Pragmatic White House Ready to Help Out?“).

We think it could be a major step in the right direction–or a major disaster. As always, “the devil is in the details.” We just hope & pray that our employees in Washington (yup–we pay their salaries!) will finally put special interests, dogma, and party politics aside long enough to work for the common good, ” we wrote back then.

Who knows, maybe they were listening in Washington.

So maybe that post coming out on April 1 was just a coincidence? What are we going to do if we get some unbelievable, hot info on April 1? Sit on it until April 2, and let the big boys get ahead of us?

In any case, the devil is still going to be in the details, which range from federal mortgage relief bonds to tax breaks for homeowners, builders, and people who buy and occupy foreclosures.

There’s still time for partisanship to kill the bill, with hearings in the house scheduled for next week. Wouldn’t it be nice if our representatives will use that time to make the bill better for the nation as a whole, rather than to grandstand or advance partisan interests.

Otherwise, the joke might just be on us.

Only we wouldn’t be laughing.

Pragmatic White House Ready to Help Out?

Monday, March 31st, 2008

Pragmatists in the Bush Administration may be gaining the upper hand, according to “Bush Readies Mortgage Aid Plan,” in Saturday’s Washington Post.

According to the article, “The Bush administration is finalizing details of a plan to rescue thousands of homeowners at risk of foreclosure by helping them refinance into more affordable mortgages backed by public funds.”

The proposal targets at least some of America’s estimated 9 million “upside down” homeowners. Under the plan, the FHA “would encourage lenders to forgive a portion of those loans and issue new, smaller mortgages in exchange for the financial backing of the federal government,” according to the article.

This appears to be a modification of a proposal by Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank, reminding us all that politics, indeed, does “make strange bedfellows.” (I’m available, Mr. Letterman. )

We think it could be a major step in the right direction–or a major disaster. As always, “the devil is in the details.” We just hope & pray that our employees in Washington (yup–we pay their salaries!) will finally put special interests, dogma, and party politics aside long enough to work for the common good.

In the meantime, if nothing else, it’s one more illustration of what we wrote last November in “How Low Will Prices Go?”–we’re in uncharted territory this time, and nobody really knows what will happen next! (If you predicted a Barney Frank/George Bush recovery plan, please let me know so I can get your input on my stocks & the Final Four next weekend!)

Top 5 Ways Not to Pick A Listing Agent

Thursday, March 27th, 2008

Over 30 years of selling property has shown us that selecting the right agent may be the single most important step to a successful sale or purchase.

Unfortunately, experience also has shown us that most sellers pick their agents for the wrong reasons, and they pay a huge price for that mistake.

Yesterday, we listed 5 of the most common mistakes sellers make in choosing an agent. Today we’ll identify the top 5, starting with one we’ve seen a lot of in the last two years, picking their agent based on:

5. Past performance as a buyers’ agent, in an easier market, or in another area. These might be good reasons to consider an agent, but they don’t prove anything about selling your property in today’s market. We could give dozens of examples from our experiences, but we’ll settle for just one, from baseball:

Just because Tim Salmon played great outfield for the Angels three years ago doesn’t mean he can play shortstop for them today. Let alone Center for the Lakers. Get the picture?

4. “She works my neighborhood.” This is called “farming,” and we do it ourselves. It’s a good way to get to know a neighborhood over time. But the number of notepads left on your porch or postcards mailed to your home proves neither competence nor integrity.

Until the agent’s been “farming” your neighborhood for at least four years, it proves nothing. In this market, you’d need to go back 17 years to get to the last major downturn!

Even with 17 years experience, you’d still want to investigate track record, and speak with sellers who’ve worked with him or her. The fliers or postcards may only tell half the story.

“Neighborhood specialists,” or “listing farmers” are like preachers, car salesmen, or Realtors as a whole. Some are ethical, competent, and diligent, but many others are not.

3. Lots of sales. This could be good or bad, but it raises a red flag. Most high volume agents operate with what they euphemistically call a “team,” which can also be good or bad.

We have a team–Dave, Blair, a transaction coordinator who is shared with several other agents, and a number of affiliates from escrow officer to termite inspector who are the best we can find. But other teams consist of several licensed and unlicensed assistants who pretty much do all the work for the named agent. You often never see the “superstar #1 agent” again after you’ve signed the listing.

At one seminar I recently heard the superstar speaker describe running into some poor seller of his in an airport. The superstar had “sold” his home a few months earlier, and he was actually bragging to us that this was the first time he’d ever actually met his “client.”

One more true story. A few years ago, the buyer for one of our listings was represented by one of those superstar top producers. When it came time for the walk-through I showed up to keep an eye on things. When the buyers came to the door (alone), I introduced myself as the listing agent. The buyer literally hugged me! “Oh my God! A real, licensed agent–not just an assistant!” she exclaimed. “We haven’t spoken with one since we signed the purchase contract seven weeks ago.”

Turns out, everything had been handled by unlicensed “assistants,” which were pretty much part-time kids. We’ve seen the same thing with sellers. They were “working” with top producing agents, but they rarely saw them, and weren’t happy campers.

2. Great listing packet or presentation. This doesn’t prove anything, either. Just because a politician’s a great campaigner with good commercials doesn’t mean he or she will make a good president or governor. It probably just means they bought a good listing presentation software package.  To get an idea of what they actually do, take them to your computer and ask them to pull up their listings on the web.  Read the remarks, check out the pictures, see how complete the data is.  Then ask to see the web sites for their current listings.  (For comparison, Blair and I buy a separate, appropriate internet “domain” name for each listing and then shoot our own virtual tour.  For example, check out LosAlDreamHome.com, which we shot July 24, 2008.

In fact, most agents know they can easily get any listing if they dress nice, are friendly, have a persuasive presentation and, most important if he or she . . .

1. Tells you what you want to hear. Works every time, and most agents know it. There are even terms for it in the business. When an agent tells you what you want to hear about price, it’s called “buying the listing.” Happens all the time–then the listing sits for months while the agent tries to get a price reduction. Worked in ’04’s up market, but not today!

Sellers have words for it, too. “Great rapport!” “We felt so good about her!” “We just really clicked!” “She was so bubbly!”

It’s kind of like interviewing three doctors about your medical condition, then going with the one who tells you every thing’s fine. Tempting, but not real smart. Better to go with the best doctor, regardless of whether you like with his diagnosis or not.

Telling you what you want to hear (instead of the truth) is amazingly effective. It appeals to the sellers’ pride as well as to their wishful thinking. Kind of like flattering them while promising to make their dreams come true. Not that different from how most politicians operate, and you know how good they are at keeping their promises.

If two people agree on everything, one of them is not necessary. If an agent agrees with you too much, they’re either lying or incompetent, or you don’t need an agent at all. It’s probably one of the first two.

You need an agent who knows and tells you the truth. I remember telling an older seller who was “interviewing” us that they really needed to remove the velvet flocked red wallpaper they loved. I knew they didn’t want to hear it, but it was the truth. A few days later I got the call. “Dave, we decided to go with Suzy Q. We just had such great rapport, and she really loved our decorating.” Guess I’m glad somebody did.

If you want to feel good, go find a friend. But if you want to sell your house for top dollar in any market, especially today, go find an honest, experienced, diligent agent who will tell you the truth.

If you missed the first half of this post, just click here for numbers 6 - 10 of the most common mistakes sellers make in choosing an agent.

Top 10 Ways Not to Pick A Listing Agent, Part I

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Poor Mr. Williams. We just drove by his house & noticed the sign was down. Hadn’t sold. If he’d read this post 6 months ago, it could have saved him at least $50,000 and half a year of his life.

Unfortunately, Mr. Williams has lots of company. We’d say at least 90% of the today’s sellers today are making at least one of ten major mistakes in picking their agent.

These are mistakes people naturally tend to make–and virtually all agents are able to easily take advantage of those tendencies if they choose to. Because they’ve listed a whole lot more homes than you have!

Here’s our list of the most common wrong reasons to pick a listing agent. Read it and weep. We do.

10. Amazing gimmicks. Mr. Williams picked his agent because of his “This House Talks” sign. Uses an 800 number to capture leads & texts them right to the agent’s phone. Very impressive to demonstrate to a potential seller.

But a gimmick is just a tool, & it doesn’t sell the home any more than the latest lazer level makes an incompetent carpenter into an expert. Selling today takes expert pricing, staging, negotiating, and marketing, plus integrity, diligence, & experience. Not one or two flashy gimmicks. Just ask Mr. Williams.

9. Mr. Williams also liked the agent’s warm friendliness. Can’t say we blame him–we like the guy too. But he’s only been in the business a few years, has never seen a market like this before, and it shows:

Of the 27 listings Mr. Williams’ friendly agent has taken over the past 12 months, only 4 have actually sold. 16 have expired or been canceled without selling–4 expireds for every sold! We had zero actual expireds in the last 12 months, but quite a few closed sales. Gimmicks and friendliness alone just don’t cut it.

8. Never list with someone from work. Inherently bad decision. Today you need a full time agent who’s good enough to make his living from real estate sales alone. If you know her from work, she’s not full time, no matter what she claims. Blair and I were both part time once–the first two years of our career, when we were also quite inexperienced. We know a whole lot more now than we knew then! Never, ever, ever list with a coworker, unless you work in a real estate office!

7. Friend or family, especially one who “really needs” the listing (duh!).

I recently met a fellow whose Lakewood home had been on the market for five months without an offer.

“How’d you pick your agent? ” I asked.

“Friend of my wife.”

“Any idea how many homes she’s sold in this tract?”

“Not as many as you.”

Actually, that agent had never even listed a home in that tract before. In fact, I just checked the SoCalMLS data base, & she’s never listed or sold a home in the entire city of Lakewood. And she’s only sold a grand total of one listing in the past 12 months, anywhere! That home in Lakewood’s still on the market, but now it’s in foreclosure.

Blood lines, friendship, club or church membership, or having a kid on the same soccer team as yours has absolutely nothing to do with being a good agent. Before you even mention your situation with a friend or relative, do some research. (We’ll give some tips in a few days.) Otherwise, you may become “obligated” to list with an agent that isn’t right for you. It’s a great way to ruin a friendship or family relationship. And lose money.

6. Because of the office or franchise. You can’t tell a book or an agent by their jacket! Our 30 years of selling hundreds of homes has taught us that their are bad agents in virtually every office. And good ones in some. You’re never even going to see the broker, let alone any franchise employee.

Franchises are primarily created to help the broker recruit agents and secondarily to pool funds for generic TV and other old-media ads.

The office we work at is affiliated with one of the most successful franchises in California, but I don’t think we’ve ever once mentioned which franchise it is. You really have to search to even find it on our commercial website. That’s because it just isn’t that important. We’re the ones our clients see & must rely on.

Those are five of the top ten mistakes we’ve seen sellers make, but this post is getting too long.

For the top five wrong reasons to list, including one that most agents know will get them the listing almost every time, just click here.

More on DataQuick’s Latest SoCal Median Price Stats

Friday, March 14th, 2008

Earlier today we discussed the stats that showed median prices in Southern California as a whole were down 19% last month from their peak in July of 2007, also touching on our projections for the rest of this year (”So Cal Price Update”).

Frankly, in our primary market areas of West Orange County and Greater Long Beach, we believe prices actually peaked in the summer of 2006, based on comparable homes. DataQuick’s 7 county numbers were skewed by the huge foreclosure problems in the Inland Empire, as well as inherent flaws in their median pricing system. The Orange County Register’s Real Estate Blog has a good summary and explanation of 8 different indexes & their most recent reports for Orange County. DataQuick showed the greatest year-over-year decline (16% in O.C.), while the other indexes ranged from 15% to 6% drops.

Basically, we still believe we’re in uncharted territory & nobody knows what’s next, as we wrote back in November (”How Low Will Prices Go?”).

Our recommendation for Los Angeles and Orange County buyers and sellers is still to focus primarily on where you are in life, not where the market is. Since nobody really knows what’s next, don’t get too obsessed with what the future holds.

If selling makes sense, why roll the dice & wait up to six years (or more?) for prices possibly to just get back where they are now?

As for buying, if you can buy a home that works for you with a 30 year fixed loan, why gamble on rates or prices going up, or waste several years of your life gambling things will get worse before they get better. (see “What to Do When Nobody Knows What’s Next.”)

We’re not saying it’s time to buy for speculative reasons, and we certainly wouldn’t be trying to “flip” right now unless I got an extraordinarily good buy (and that does happen in market’s like this). I’m certainly not saying we’ve hit bottom.

We’re saying nobody really knows, because we’ve never seen anything like this. For example–we think the Fed caught just about everybody by surprise this week with their creative moves to enhance liquidity.

Who know what might come next? If some lenders were smart, they’d just shave $100,000 off the loan if needed to avoid foreclosure. They’d certainly drop interest rates or eliminate the obscene resets they have coming. (Of course, if they were smart, they wouldn’t have made 100% loans to subprime borrowers without income verifications when the market was obviously peaking, but maybe they can learn. . . .)

We’re saying nobody knows what the future holds, especially this time. So if you’ve always dreamed of a home on a lake in Lake Forest & find one that works for you with 30 year fixed financing, & if you’ve got a stable job & aren’t moving, why not make an offer & start living your dream? If it works, maybe you should let your life determine decisions, not speculation. Here’s a novel thought: think of it as a home, not a piggy bank!

Ditto to sellers. Forget what your neighbor got 2 years ago. Prices on your next home are down too, and so are interest rates. Maybe you can’t get the triple garage, but maybe you never would. If everything else works, give it a shot. You’re not getting any younger!

We’ve watched the market and buyers and sellers for 30 years, and we see some unique opportunities right now that may not last. And we see too many people making decisions based on ego or gambling in stead of getting on with their lives.

Feel free to call 562 822 SOLD or simply comment if you want specific input on your situation.

Overcorrecting?

Sunday, March 2nd, 2008

Sunday’s New York Times had an interesting article on“How a Bubble Stayed Under the Radar,” dealing with economic theory and herd mentality.

Basically, it said what any long term observer of either the real estate or stock markets must have already concluded: Market prices get too high near the end of most up cycles, and too low at the end of most down cycles.

I figured that out at least three cycles ago, when another Realtor mentioned the insane bidding up of home values in 1989 was typical of the last, overpricing gasps of a market about to collapse. I thought our market had peaked in 2004, which was obviously too early. Still, in 2005 I made my ill-fated effort to beat the market by exchanging for out of state property (see my recent post on out of state investing). It’s the same herd mentality that created bubbles from internet stocks to silver.

Ironically, as our southern California prices drop, people tend to forget the flip side of the same herd mentality: The lows become irrational as well. Which either will at some point create or is currently creating opportunites to “buy low.”

I don’t think anybody can know with certainty if that time of opportunity is now or yet future. Once we know for certain, it will have past, and the best bargains will be gone.

But I do know that thousands of homes are on the market for prices 20% to 40% below the highs of a few years back. And I do know that many sellers are willing to take far less than they’re asking. And interest rates are also quite low.

I also know that prices tend to go up in the first half of the year and down in the second. So it appears that this year’s great opportunity may be passing. December of 2009 may present even greater opportunities. Or not.

But at some point, this market will overcorrect. Maybe it already has.

All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2008 Design by StyleShout and Clazh