So Cal Real Estate News

(July 30, 2008)  At 9 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, on the last Tuesday of every month, McGraw-Hill’s Standard & Poor’s Unit releases the  Case-Schiller Home Price Index for the previous month, just like clockwork.

The news media love it:  “Breaking news” on housing they can schedule into their calendar months in advance, just like DataQuick’s monthly median home sales price reports.

Conversely, Case Schiller must love the media. If it’s the last Tuesday of the month, Case-Schiller will on the radio,  be all over the internet, in the networks’ evening news, and in the next day’s paper.

There’s one thing to love about the Case Schiller Home Price Index, and at least two problems.

About Case-Schiller, In S & P’s Own Words:

Let’s start by getting an overview “straight from the horse’s mouth:”

The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices measures the residential housing market, tracking changes in the value of the residential real estate market in 20 metropolitan regions across the United States.

These indices use the repeat sales pricing technique to measure housing markets. First developed by Karl Case and Robert Shiller, this methodology collects data on single-family home re-sales, capturing re-sold sale prices to form sale pairs. This index family consists of 20 regional indices and two composite indices as aggregates of the regions.

The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are calculated monthly and published with a two month lag.

Looks like we may have just given away one of those problems, but before we get into that, let’s see exactly how these folks come up with their numbers, again taken from their own website (links at the end of this post).  The key to their method is a tool Karl Case and Robert Schiller came up with back in the 1980’s.  According to S & P:

They developed the repeat sales pricing technique, still considered the most accurate way to measure this asset class. [even if they do say so themselves!] The methodology measures the movement in price of single-family homes in certain regions.

This is done by collecting data on sale prices of specific single-family homes in the region. Each sale price is considered a data point. When a specific home is resold, months or years later, the new sale price is matched to the home’s first sale price.   These two data points are called a “sale pair.” The difference in the sale pair is measured and recorded. All the sales pairs in a region are then aggregated into one index.

Sales pairs are carefully screened for any data points that would distort the index. These factors include foreclosures, non-arms length transactions (sales between family members) and suspected data errors where the order of magnitude of the change is substantially different from other sales pairs in the region.

Once the “sales pairs” have been screened, they are weighted:

The indices are designed to measure the change in the price of homes that have not undergone significant positive or negative changes in quality. Sales pairs are assigned weights to account for fluctuations in price that can be attributed to factors like extensive home remodeling, adding a home addition, or extreme neglect.

For example, the indices assign smaller weights to sales pairs with large change in sales price relative to the community around them. The assumption is that this change is due to remodeling or neglect. Sales pairs are also weighted based on time intervals between sales.  Sales pairs with longer time intervals are given less weight than sales pairs with shorter intervals to account for the probability of physical changes.

In other words, Case-Schiller compares sales of the same property, trying to eliminate sales where changes in value could be influenced by neglect, upgrades or sales between family members

What’s not to like about that?

All indices have strengths and weaknesses.

Problem # 1:  A bigger lag than you think!

One of Case-Schiller’s weaknesses seems pretty obvious:  a two month lag.  However, as the infomercial salesperson says, “but wait, there’s more!” Again, from Case-Schiller themselves:

The monthly indices use a three-month moving average algorithm. Home sales
pairs are accumulated in rolling three-month periods, on which the repeat sales
methodology is applied. The index point for each reporting month is based on
sales pairs found for that month and the preceding two months. For example, the
March 2008 index point is based on repeat sales data for January, February and
March of 2008.

OK, time for a pop quiz.  Exactly when was that “March 2008 index” released?  The last Tuesday in April!

We’re not just looking at a two month lag here–we’re looking at a two-month lag on stats averaged over three months.  Using the middle of that three month range, we’ve got a three and a half month lag, with a five month lag on the oldest stats!

Let’s use a more current example.  I’m writing this on Wednesday morning, July 30, 2008.  Yesterday, July 29, Case-Schiller released their report for May, which was actually a composite of March, April, and May closings.

“But wait, there’s more!”

When did those March, April, and May closings go into escrow?  Here in Southern California, the “average” escrow is about 45 days, although lending problems often stretch that out, especially in the current chaotic mortgage market.  In the current market, it often takes about a week of negotiation before escrow is actually opened.  Some agents wait even longer, until the buyer has a physical inspection completed and repairs negotiated.  So those deals that closed in March, April, and May were actually negotiated during January, February, and March!

Yup, that’s right.  The price drop the media breathlessly hailed yesterday took place on sales that were negotiated five to seven months ago.  Now that’s what I call a lagging index!

Bet you didn’t hear those little details on the news last night!

Other problems:

Case-Schiller tells us they try to “carefully screen” the matched pairs they base their report upon, but a computer can only do so much.  They can spot changes in square footage between sales, but tax records in California rarely reveal anything about most kitchen remodels, let alone “neglect.”   Sales between family members are easy to spot if everyone has the last name, but that’s only the case some of the time.  And what if the last name is as common as Smith, Rodriquez, or Nguyen?

Random note: I just misspelled “Nguyen,” and Firefox’s spell check caught it!  I’m impressed.  If you’re still using Internet Explorer, maybe it’s time for a free download!

Besides an amazingly long lag and probelms in screening the “matched pairs” of sales, other problems  include the use of broad regions. Real estate trends can vary dramatically between adjoining zip codes, school districts, and even condo projects; painting with a broad brush obscures significant details.

Since Case-Schiller reports an index, not actual prices, it gets even harder to interpret.  Does a 23%  drop in the index really indicate a 23% drop in prices?  Does anyone really know what it actually indicates?  If you’re a CPA or statistician, you might want to follow the links at the end of this post deeper into C-S’s explanations and let us know your conclusions with a comment.  In any case, with an “index” we’re an additional step away from actual prices.

Finally, for now at least, Case-Schiller doesn’t tell us anything about sales volume–it just gives us a cryptic but supposedly well though-out index of price.

So What’s to Like About Case-Schiller?

For all its flaws, Case-Shiller is an index that seeks to get beyond averaging medians (see “Two big problems with DataQuick’s monthly median price reports“).  It gives us useful data from a different perspective that can be helpful looking back.  But the time lag makes it problematic for forecasting or even for evaluating forecasts.  It’s hard to figure out what’s going to happen next, when you don’t yet know what’s been happening over the past three months.

So What Do We Make of Case-Schiller’s Latest Numbers?

As one would expect from a lagging index, they tend to confirm what we already know:  Prices were down dramatically earlier this year.  In fact, for the Los Angeles and Orange County regions, home prices last winter were down about 25% from a year earlier.  That’s the crux of yesterday’s C-S report.

The big mistake we see right now is the impression that this is a new, record-breaking drop.  It’s just old news about the record-breaking drop that was occuring in the market last winter, and that DataQuick when they released their their closing data for the spring months. Old news.

C-S’s latest report certainly doesn’t change the opinion of where the market’s headed that we posted last Friday.  Nor does it change our basic recommendations of what potential sellers and buyers should do in uncertain times like these.

Today’s unusual real estate market presents unusual opportunities along with some risks.  For buyers, the risks have been dramatically reduced from a year and a half ago, as Case-Schiller’s most recent numbers document.

For more information:

Link to Case-Schiller’s monthly Home Price Indices

Standard & Poor’s own description of their Case-Schiller index

Making Sausage: S & P’s own description of how the Case-Schiller indices are compiled

Wikipedia entry on the Case-Schiller Index (Not Wikipedia’s best article–disappointing and confusing)

We got our April “Research Update” from NAR yesterday (”Existing Home Sales to Stabilize Before Upturn in Second Half of 2008“) . That seems too optimistic to us.

Maybe Lawrence Yun, their new Chief Economist, hasn’t heard about the annual cycle yet (See “Market Predictions 101:  Our 2 Real Estate Cycles“), because he thinks things will start picking up when they start slowing down in most years.

Here are the first three paragraphs of NAR’s press release:

Little change is expected in existing-home sales over the next few months, before improving notably during the second half of the year, according to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors®.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the market will come into clearer focus this summer.  “Existing home sales could start to show a sustained increase within a few months, unless there are some additional economic problems or excessive inflationary pressure,” he said.  “We’re looking for essentially stable sales in the near term, before higher mortgage loan limits translate into more sales in high-cost markets.  The wider access to affordable credit should increase sales activity notably this summer as pent-up demand begins to be met.”

The Pending Home Sales Index,* a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in February, slipped 1.9 percent to 84.6 from an upwardly revised reading of 86.2 in January, and was 21.4 percent lower than the February 2007 index of 107.6.  “The slip in pending home sales implies we’re not out of the woods yet, though an era of successive deep sales declines appears to be over,” Yun said.

We do see some signs of bottoming, but from where our office sits on the OC/LA County line off the 605 in Lakewood, we really can’t tell if it’s just a spring uptick on a longer downward trail.  We’re still sticking with our most recent forecast (see “A Change in Our Projections?“)

We think DataQuick’s numbers from yesterday only tend to confirm our perspective (”What DQs numbers mean“)

Default Research, Inc. has posted their California county by county foreclosure numbers for March, and So Cal county numbers are pretty much up across the board to the highest numbers yet for the current downturn.

This report is made up primarily of Notice of Defaults (NODs), the first step in the 4 month foreclosure process. It sounds like the number of bank owned (REO) homes coming on the market will continue to increase well into fall throughout Southern California.

Bear in mind that filing for bankruptcy can add several months to that 4 month process, and additional time is required by the lender to gain occupancy and then make any needed repairs. So these NODs reported for March will be coming on the market as REOs no earlier than July, and well into fall. Of course, not all NOD properties end up foreclosed. (For tips on buying foreclosures, click here: “Foreclosure Tips.”)

But there’s a big “if.” One of the unknowns is what will end up in the Housing Relief Act currently working it’s way through Congress. If Congress gets it right, that could dramatically reduce the number of homes actually taken back by the banks.

We’re hoping Congress and/or the lenders come up with a reasonable program to allow qualified owners to hold onto their homes, but we’re not exactly holding our breath, either. We think debt relief for qualified buyers primarily provided by their lender in exchange for concessions by Congress and the borrower could significantly mitigate the impact of all these foreclosures on the market, but I’m starting to sound like Bernanke, which is really scary!

So I’ll leave what Congress might do for another post, except to say two things:

1. Some home owners who bought with subprime 100% liar loans that really have no business owning property.
2. We are at some risk of another Great Depression caused by the current crisis, and if some unworthy homeowners and lenders are helped in the process of saving the rest of us, so be it. When my lifeboat’s sinking, I prefer to focus on bailing it out rather than arguing about who got us into the mess. “Blessed are the merciful. . . ” wasn’t my idea, but it saves a lot of grief in the long run.

Bottom line: Looks like the bottom for prices is still a ways off, maybe a long ways. Like Freddie Mac’s Chief Economist told us last October, we’re in uncharted territory, and nobody really knows what’s going to happen next (see “How Low Will Prices Go?“).

That said, we’re still sticking to our best guess that prices are most likely to hit bottom either this December or next (see our most recent projections post, “A Change in Our Projections?”

BTW, this market is troubled, but not dead. We just put our last listing into escrow in 3 days last week. Like we keep saying, it’s not rocket science (see “How to Sell Your So Cal Home for Top Dollar in 30 Days“).

Default Research uses actual visits to the court houses to collect their data, which should make it more accurate and more timely than most other foreclosure reporting services. If you want to look directly at their charts for every county in California going back to 2006, just click here. We also have a direct link to their “California N.O.D. (Foreclosure) Stats” under “Great Links” near the top of our right sidebar.

You will see each Southern California county had a new record for NODs in March, with one anomaly. Most lenders do not file NODs over the Christmas holiday period. (I’ve been told that’s because lenders really aren’t total Scrooges, but I suspect it may also be because they take some time off then.) So you will notice NODs were down about 50% across the board for December, but up about 50% for January. That’s why some counties show higher numbers for January than for March–but not if you average the two winter months.

Stay tuned for more breaking news as our adventure in So Cal real estate continues. . . .

In the meantime, forward to our next post, “Let’s Go Ducks!”, for something a little more positive. We hope.

April 10 update: In the week since writing this post, the roller coaster ride of hopeful and negative news has continued unabated.

One thing that concerns us is this week’s release of California’s Foreclosure stats for March, however (see “So Cal Defaults Up Again & What it Means”). has got us reconsidering. But there are a couple hopeful possibilities we’re also keeping our eyes on. We’re watching to see what Congress might do next, and keeping another eye on the ever-surprising Fed.

So stay tuned for further developments. In the meantime, we still think this is as accurate a description of where we’re at & where we’re going as we can write. For now.

We concluded our last post (”Two Problems with DataQuick’s Median Prices,” with our observation that the actual drop in So Cal home values from top to current bottom is about 25 - 30% (less in higher end areas, more in condos, starter areas, and areas with lots of new construction).

The obvious question is, “How Much More Should So Cal Prices Have to Correct?”

25 - 30% may well be about the right amount of correcting–nobody knows for sure, as we keep saying (see “How Low will Prices Go?“).

But the market will almost certainly overcorrect, especially with all the current negativity, all the foreclosures still in process, and the difficulties getting mortgages continuing.

Ben Bernanke, the Fed Chairman, thinks governmental actions already in place will begin to kick in later this year, and things will slowly begin improving from there. He hopes, but he’s not sure. (See “Bernanke predicts bottom later this year” for excerpts from his Wednesday testimony with our English “translation”/summaries.) Remember, however, that part of his job seems to be keeping an optimistic spin going.

But UC San Diego’s Nobel Prize winning economist, Clive Granger, thinks the U.S. economy has already been in a recession for about four months. He expects the current recession to last an additional 2-6 months, depending on what occurs in the housing and financial markets. Like Bernanke, that puts the bottom later this year.

Slightly more pessimistic is Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft. (He was also the panelist from last October’s CAR Expo who formed the basis for our belief that nobody knows what will happen next with his remarks that “we’re in uncharted territory.”) (Obviously, that belief hasn’t stopped us from making our best guesses at what’s next.)

Maybe Dr. Nothaft now thinks the picture’s becoming a bit clearer. Last week he told a lunch audience that he expects that life should begin to return to the housing sector late this year or early next but says prices may not recover significantly until 2010.

Then this morning DataQuick released figures for OC showing prices were still dropping but sales volume is continuing to rise, as we’ve been predicting (see the Register’s R.E. blog for details). (Also bear in mind what we said yesterday about DataQuick’s numbers being several months behind, among other things.

Then this afternoon the Register blog put up another post quoting a South OC Realtor who does a lot of number crunching saying what we basically said a month ago, that activity’s picking up.

Now remember what we said about those two So Cal real estate market cycles on Wednesday. Annual cycle: up in the spring, down in the fall. Add in these predictions that the economic cycle may be nearing a bottom, and what do you get? Could it be we’ll hit bottom this winter, not a year later as we had been thinking?

Maybe, but what about today’s increase in unemployment to 5.1%, with economists particularly worried because the drop was so broadspread, no longer limited to housing and construction.

This morning I spoke with one broker I’ve known for 30 years about activity in his office. Yeah, he said, sales (opening of escrows) were up in February, but then they dropped a bit in March, and the last few weeks have been especially slow. The March slowdown he attributed to actual competition for houses, citing one agent who had presented 8 offers for one buyer who needed help with closing costs. There were enough competing offers and enough buyer activity that the sellers were no longer making those concessions.

The cause of the slowdown over the last two weeks , however, was harder to figure out. “Dave, there’s just so many cross currents,” he told me. “The market’s just in flux.”

That flux may mean that we’re nearing a bottom. Or it may mean the mini-upturn we saw in February and March is turning down.

Or it may just mean it’s still too early to tell what’s going on.

This post was intended to update our projections. So I looked up our most recent forecasting post, March 24’s “What’s Next for Southern California Housing.”

Here’s what we said in summary back then:

“We continue to expect a window of opportunity for sellers for the next several months, followed by opportunities for buyers through this winter. We still thing there’s a significant chance (20%?) of a major price collapse of an additional 15 - 25% , but there’s also a possibility that the worst is behind us.”

“Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something. up”

Looks like there’s not a whole lot to update, although there are some things I might tweak:

• That window of opportunity for sellers may already be starting to close.
• An additional price decline of 5% - 10% through this winter is probably the most likely scenario, but by no means a certainty.
• There’s a significant possibility that the market will bottom this winter, but it’s still to early to really know.
• There’s also evidence that real estate’s woes may spread through the economy and pull prices down much further, into a recession that might last for years.
• Washington is becoming increasingly proactive, which could be good. . . or bad, depending on what specific steps are taken.
• One thing hasn’t changed at all:

Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something up.

What to do? Guess it’s time to again refer to our December 1 post, “What to do when nobody knows what’s next.”

Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something up.

We’d love to hear your thoughts, especially what you see happening in your corner of So Cal.

April 10 note: As of this morning, we’re beginning to think the bottom’s probably at least 20 months off, rather than the 8 we’ve been hoping for recently. Those foreclosure stats we mentioned really have us concerned, but we may be overreacting to one item. Because you never know for sure what’s going to happen next!

Excerpts from his prepared remarks to Congress today, with my attempts at decoding and summarizing in italics preceding each segment:

We’re not out of the woods yet:

Although our recent actions appear to have helped stabilize the situation somewhat, financial markets remain under considerable stress. Pressures in short-term bank funding markets, which had abated somewhat beginning late last year, have increased once again.

It’s harder to get any loan because of all the losses due to the mortgage mess:

Credit availability has also been restricted because some large financial institutions, including some commercial and investment banks and the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), have reported substantial losses and writedowns, reducing their available capital. Several of these firms have been able to raise fresh capital to offset at least some of those losses, and others are in the process of doing so. However, financial institutions’ balance sheets have also expanded, as banks and other institutions have taken on their balance sheets various assets that can no longer be financed on a standalone basis. Thus, the capacity and willingness of some large institutions to extend new credit remains limited.

Even “conforming” loans (Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) have gotten pricier, and non conforming loans are almost non existent:

Another market that had previously been largely exempt from disruptions was that for mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by government agencies. However, beginning in mid-February, worsening liquidity conditions and reports of losses at the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, caused the spread of agency MBS yields over the yields on comparable Treasury securities to rise sharply. Together with the increased fees imposed by the GSEs, the rise in this spread resulted in higher interest rates on conforming mortgages. More recently, agency MBS spreads and conforming mortgage rates have retraced part of this increase, and conforming mortgages continue to be readily available to households. However, for the most part, the nonconforming segment of the mortgage market continues to function poorly.

The housing market remains weak, and that’s hurting everyone:

These developments in financial markets–which themselves reflect, in part, greater concerns about housing and the economic outlook more generally–have weighed on real economic activity. Notably, in the housing market, sales of both new and existing homes have generally continued weak, partly as a result of the reduced availability of mortgage credit, and home prices have continued to fall.¹ Starts of new single-family homes declined an additional 7 percent in February, bringing the cumulative decline since the early 2006 peak in single-family starts to more than 60 percent. Residential construction is likely to contract somewhat further in coming quarters as builders try to reduce their high inventories of unsold new homes.

Things are worse than we thought, but we think they’ll start getting better later this year. But nobody really knows. [We've been telling you that since November!]

Overall, the near-term economic outlook has weakened relative to the projections released by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) at the end of January. It now appears likely that real gross domestic product (GDP) will not grow much, if at all, over the first half of 2008 and could even contract slightly. We expect economic activity to strengthen in the second half of the year, in part as the result of stimulative monetary and fiscal policies; and growth is expected to proceed at or a little above its sustainable pace in 2009, bolstered by a stabilization of housing activity, albeit at low levels, and gradually improving financial conditions. However, in light of the recent turbulence in financial markets, the uncertainty attending this forecast is quite high and the risks remain to the downside.

We think inflation will start dropping later this year, but we’re not really sure about that either:

We expect inflation to moderate in coming quarters. That expectation is based, in part, on futures markets’ indications of a leveling out of prices for oil and other commodities, and it is consistent with our projection that global growth–and thus the demand for commodities–will slow somewhat during this period. And, as I noted, we project an easing of pressures on resource utilization. However, some indicators of inflation expectations have risen, and, overall, uncertainty about the inflation outlook has increased. It will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully in the months ahead.

We think we’re finally on the right track, and expect to turn a corner during the second half of this year. (”Things will turn out fine in 2009?”)

Clearly, the U.S. economy is going through a very difficult period. But among the great strengths of our economy is its ability to adapt and to respond to diverse challenges. Much necessary economic and financial adjustment has already taken place, and monetary and fiscal policies are in train that should support a return to growth in the second half of this year and next year. I remain confident in our economy’s long-term prospects.

At least, that’s what I think he said. Click here for Bernanke’s complete prepared text.

Click here for the L.A. Times’ report on Bernanke’s remarks.

And feel free to use the “comment” option to express your opinion, but in relatively polite language, please.

We sure hope he’s right. Could be.

Pragmatists in the Bush Administration may be gaining the upper hand, according to “Bush Readies Mortgage Aid Plan,” in Saturday’s Washington Post.

According to the article, “The Bush administration is finalizing details of a plan to rescue thousands of homeowners at risk of foreclosure by helping them refinance into more affordable mortgages backed by public funds.”

The proposal targets at least some of America’s estimated 9 million “upside down” homeowners. Under the plan, the FHA “would encourage lenders to forgive a portion of those loans and issue new, smaller mortgages in exchange for the financial backing of the federal government,” according to the article.

This appears to be a modification of a proposal by Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank, reminding us all that politics, indeed, does “make strange bedfellows.” (I’m available, Mr. Letterman. )

We think it could be a major step in the right direction–or a major disaster. As always, “the devil is in the details.” We just hope & pray that our employees in Washington (yup–we pay their salaries!) will finally put special interests, dogma, and party politics aside long enough to work for the common good.

In the meantime, if nothing else, it’s one more illustration of what we wrote last November in “How Low Will Prices Go?”–we’re in uncharted territory this time, and nobody really knows what will happen next! (If you predicted a Barney Frank/George Bush recovery plan, please let me know so I can get your input on my stocks & the Final Four next weekend!)

This one seemed to fly under the radar of most media, but C.A.R’s Chief Economist recently revised her 2008 projections from the figures released in Anaheim last October.

Total sales statewide were revised down a modest half a percent to 332,100, but her projected CA decline in the median price for a single family home was increased a whopping 50%, to a 9%! Leslie Appleton-Young also now projects that units sold will bottom this year, but with only modest improvement in 2009. Apparently her jury’s still out on when prices will hit bottom.

We like Leslie & have followed her reports for years, but you have to remember who pays her salary. Last October we indicated that it would most likely be worse than she predicted. Unfortunately, we were right then, & she’s still probably still a bit too optimistic.

Click here for The Register’s summary of Leslie’s recent remarks, and
here for a PDF version of the original, October report. Our most recent projections are here, and our thoughts on who should be buying or selling now haven’t changed from what we wrote in December, a classic piece on balancing market timing with your personal situation, even if we do say so ourselves.

Update added 4/7: Lots has happened since we wrote this post about two weeks ago, but it hasn’t resulted in any major changes to our projections. We did, however, release an updated projections post over the weekend: “A Change in Our Projections?”

The roller-coaster ride continues with this morning’s news:

1. Nationwide February resale closing numbers from the National Association of Realtors mirror DataQuick’s So Cal Numbers from last week: Sales up, prices down.

Why the sales increase “caught economists by surprise” is completely beyond us. January closings were the lowest on record, homes that went into escrow during the Thanksgiving to Christmas slowdown in a terrible year. They had nowhere to go but up as we move into spring.

We’ve been predicting the increase since we saw sales picking up in our market in January, & we also think March will reflect an additional increase in sales and possibly at least some firming of prices, maybe increases.

You read it here first–which is our goal, bringing you Los Angeles and Orange County real estate news from the front lines– not the ivory towers! Click for Blomberg’s reporting of NAR’s data.

2. Bear Stearns’ bad loans apparently weren’t as bad as originally thought, since Morgan-Chase this morning quintupled their bid from $2 per share to $10. Maybe things aren’t as bad as they seem? (Click here for our take on how we got into this mortgage mess & on Bear Stearns’ culpability.)

3. Stocks are up. But so are foreclosures. (For some insights into buying foreclosures, click here for our initial “Foreclosure Tips” post.)

This is just more evidence to us that we were right when we said last November that this downturn was wildly unpredictable. But we also told you What to do When Nobody Knows What’s Next.

Sellers, you may also want to review our summary of our workshop on “How to Sell Your So Cal Home for Top Dollar in 30 Days.”

That said, if you’re still intent on market timing to the exclusion of all else (that is, you don’t have a life?) we continue to expect a window of opportunity for sellers for the next several months, followed by opportunities for buyers through this winter. We still think there’s a significant chance (20%?) of a major price collapse of an additional 15 - 25% , but there’s also a possibility that the worst is behind us.

Sorry the picture isn’t clearer, but we’d rather tell you the truth than make something up. Feel free to post your comments, thoughts or questions, we try to respond to every one. Or call us if you want to talk further (562.430.0262).

Added 4/3: If you want to read excerpts from Ben Bernanke’s April 2 testimony to Congress about where he thinks we’re at and where we’re headed, check out “Bernanke Predicts Bottom Later this Year?!“

We even translated some of his remarks into English, for those of us who don’t speak economist. He pretty much agrees with us, except he’s a little more optimistic. But we think that’s part of his job. Being moderately optimistic, that is, not agreeing with us.

4/7: For our updated projections post, check out “A Change in Our Projections?

Reporting from the front lines of the real estate battles here in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, we can now definitely say that sales activity and even prices are bouncing back from the record lows of November - January.
We think this provides local sellers with a window of opportunity, but it’s a window that will most likely be closing in a matter of months. . . or weeks.

Want evidence? We discussed our own increase in sales activity in our 2/29 Market Update post–3 listings sold in an average of about 8 days each. Then Blair noticed that our office “board” of new escrows was full for the first time in about a year, another major increase in activity. Then last night I ran into Ken, our termite expert from Coastline Termite, at the Anaheim Ducks game, and he reported a dramatic increase in sale inspections.

Trouble is, we experienced a similar bump last winter, but it petered out as interest rates went up in the spring. Then it fell apart as the subprime mortgage mess exploded, making it difficult to impossible to get a mortgage. Long term mortgage rates are rising again, as our elected officials try to borrow their way out of a recession, especially with an election breathing down their necks. And the “other shoe” of the subprime mess is dropping as I keyboard, with foreclosures only increasing their record pace.

Then there’s the annual cycle–busy spring, slow fall, prices dropping by winter. Put it all together, and it’s our opinion that sellers need to “make hay while the sun shines.” And it could stop shining sooner than you’d like. If you’d like more info, leave a comment or give us a call at 562.822.SOLD.

What about buyers? Prices, and even interest rates, could well be lower this coming December. In fact, the whole thing might fall apart in 2009, once the election’s behind us. But we wouldn’t be too surprised if prices continue to slowly move upwards, at least in the coastal plains of L.A. and Orange Counties. So, if you find a home that you really like, and you can afford with a 10 - 30 year fixed loan, and it’s in a good location, go ahead & buy it now. If not, keep saving up a down, paying down credit card debt, & looking around. If you want a direct portal to the Southern California Multiple Listing Service, just click on the link you prefer under “Multiple Listing Services” near the top of the right column.  We suggest you start with “Info & Tips on M.L.S. Searches.”

Finally, a word about timing. We’re talking about current activity–homes going into escrow. What the media usually reports is closed sales, which take place roughly 45 days after a home goes into escrow, then get reported in DataQuick’s confusing median price summaries about two weeks after the end of the month in which they close, which is about 60 - 90 days after they went into escrow. So the increases we’ve seen over the last few weeks won’t be reported until long after they close in April and late March.

Just mark your calendar–around 4/15 DataQuick (or “DataSlow,” as we prefer) will report a remarkable increase in sales for L.A. and Orange County homes, which will continue into the April closings they report mid May. You read it here first.

So, that’s today’s word from the front lines. We’d appreciate your thoughts & comments. Personally, we hope the Anaheim Ducks repeat last year’s spring performance, but the So Cal real estate market takes a more steady, less bumpy road this year. If not. . . there’s always baseball! Anybody up for a Freeway World Series?

Sunday’s New York Times had an interesting article on“How a Bubble Stayed Under the Radar,” dealing with economic theory and herd mentality.

Basically, it said what any long term observer of either the real estate or stock markets must have already concluded: Market prices get too high near the end of most up cycles, and too low at the end of most down cycles.

I figured that out at least three cycles ago, when another Realtor mentioned the insane bidding up of home values in 1989 was typical of the last, overpricing gasps of a market about to collapse. I thought our market had peaked in 2004, which was obviously too early. Still, in 2005 I made my ill-fated effort to beat the market by exchanging for out of state property (see my recent post on out of state investing). It’s the same herd mentality that created bubbles from internet stocks to silver.

Ironically, as our southern California prices drop, people tend to forget the flip side of the same herd mentality: The lows become irrational as well. Which either will at some point create or is currently creating opportunites to “buy low.”

I don’t think anybody can know with certainty if that time of opportunity is now or yet future. Once we know for certain, it will have past, and the best bargains will be gone.

But I do know that thousands of homes are on the market for prices 20% to 40% below the highs of a few years back. And I do know that many sellers are willing to take far less than they’re asking. And interest rates are also quite low.

I also know that prices tend to go up in the first half of the year and down in the second. So it appears that this year’s great opportunity may be passing. December of 2009 may present even greater opportunities. Or not.

But at some point, this market will overcorrect. Maybe it already has.